journal article·2011-12

Highly mobile twinned interface in 10M modulated Ni–Mn–Ga martensite: Analysis beyond the tetragonal approximation of lattice

L. Straka, O. Heczko, H. Seiner, N. Lanska, J. Drahokoupil, A. Soroka, S. Fähler, H. Hänninen, A. Sozinov

Acta Materialia· Volume 59· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The huge strains that Ni–Mn–Ga magnetic shape memory alloys can achieve are usually described in a tetragonal unit cell approximation of a five-layered modulated (10 M) crystal structure. Here we analyze the impact of a slight orthorhombic and monoclinic distortion of the 10 M structure in Ni 50.2 Mn 28.3 Ga 21.5at.% single crystal. Combining dedicated experiments to probe the microstructure, structure and mechanical properties with calculation using elastic continuum theory, we prove the existence of fine a / b -laminates within modulation macrotwins of the order of 100 micrometers in size. This complex twin microstructure containing a Type II macrotwin interface is associated with an extraordinarily low twinning stress of between 0.05 and 0.3 MPa, while Type I twins exhibit twinning stress of about 1 MPa. The findings provide important guidelines for designing the martensitic microstructure for more efficient actuators.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Sozinov · Mat Sci Eng A · 2004 · 378 · 39910.1016/j.msea.2003.10.365 ↗
2. Marioni · Appl Phys Lett · 2003 · 83 · 396610.1063/1.1626021 ↗
3. Tickle · J Mag Mag Mat · 1999 · 195 · 62710.1016/S0304-8853(99)00292-9 ↗
4. Likhachev · Mech Mater · 2006 · 38 · 55110.1016/j.mechmat.2005.05.022 ↗
5. Park · J Appl Phys · 1997 · 82 · 180410.1063/1.365983 ↗
6. Straka · J Phys: Conf Ser · 2011 · 303 · 012079
7. Straka · Appl Phys Lett · 2010 · 96 · 13190310.1063/1.3373608 ↗
8. Gaitzsch · Acta Mat · 2009 · 57 · 36510.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.017 ↗
9. Scheerbaum · New J Phys · 2008 · 10 · 07300210.1088/1367-2630/10/7/073002 ↗
10. Chmielus · Nature Mat · 2009 · 8 · 86310.1038/nmat2527 ↗
11. Thomas · Adv Mater · 2009 · 21 · 370810.1002/adma.200900469 ↗
12. Heczko · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 92 · 07250210.1063/1.2883961 ↗
13. James · Phil Mag A · 1998 · 77 · 127310.1080/01418619808214252 ↗
14. Ullakko · Appl Phys Lett · 1996 · 69 · 196610.1063/1.117637 ↗
15. Faran · J Mech Phys Sol · 2011 · 59 · 97510.1016/j.jmps.2011.02.009 ↗
16. Heczko · IEEE Trans Mag · 2000 · 36 · 326610.1109/20.908764 ↗
17. Ganor · App Phys Lett · 2008 · 93 · 12250910.1063/1.2982916 ↗
18. Dunand · Adv Mater · 2011 · 23 · 21610.1002/adma.201002753 ↗
19. Heczko · App Phys Lett · 2008 · 93 · 02250310.1063/1.2957675 ↗
20. O’Handley RC, Lograsso TA. private communication.
21. Straka · Acta Mat · 2008 · 56 · 549210.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.020 ↗
22. Müllner · J Mag Mag Mat · 2003 · 267 · 32510.1016/S0304-8853(03)00400-1 ↗
23. Müllner · Acta Mat · 2010 · 58 · 524210.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.048 ↗
24. Müllner · J App Phys · 2005 · 95 · 153110.1063/1.1639144 ↗
25. Mogylnyy · Scripta Mat. · 2003 · 48 · 142710.1016/S1359-6462(03)00108-8 ↗
26. Li · Acta Mat · 2011 · 59 · 276210.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.015 ↗
27. Nishida · Mat Sci Eng A · 2008 · 481–482 · 1810.1016/j.msea.2007.01.179 ↗
28. Sozinov · Appl Phys Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 12410310.1063/1.3640489 ↗
29. Straka · Appl Phys Lett · 2011 · 98 · 14190210.1063/1.3573860 ↗
30. Ge · Mat Sci Eng A · 2006 · 438 · 96110.1016/j.msea.2005.12.057 ↗
31. Lanska · J Appl Phys · 2004 · 95 · 807410.1063/1.1748860 ↗
32. Righi · Acta Mat · 2007 · 55 · 523710.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.040 ↗
33. Hartman · App Opt · 1981 · 20 · 266510.1364/AO.20.002665 ↗
34. Heczko · J Mag Mag Mat · 2001 · 226–230 · 99610.1016/S0304-8853(00)01170-7 ↗
35. Pogany · Scanning · 1992 · 14 · 26310.1002/sca.4950140504 ↗
36. Cullity · 2001
37. Ge · App Phys Lett · 2006 · 89 · 08250210.1063/1.2335811 ↗
38. Ge · J Phys IV · 2003 · 112 · 921
39. Martynov · J de Phys III · 1992 · 2 · 739
40. Khachaturyan · Phys Rev B · 1991 · 43 · 1083210.1103/PhysRevB.43.10832 ↗
41. Kaufmann · Phys Rev Lett · 2010 · 104 · 14570210.1103/PhysRevLett.104.145702 ↗
42. Bhattacharya · 2003
43. Ball JM, Koumatos K, Seiner H. An analysis of non-classical austenite–martensite interfaces in CuAlNi. In: Olson GB, Lieberman DS, Saxena A. editors. Proceedings of the international conference on martensitic transformations, ICOMAT-08. TMS, Pennsylvania; 2009. p. 383 .10.1002/9781118803592.ch56 ↗
44. Waitz · Acta Mat · 2005 · 53 · 227310.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.033 ↗
45. Ball · Arch Rat Mech Anal · 1987 · 100 · 1310.1007/BF00281246 ↗
46. Ball · Phil Trans R Soc Lond A · 1992 · 338 · 38910.1098/rsta.1992.0013 ↗
47. Bhattacharya · Arch Rat Mech Anal · 1999 · 149 · 12310.1007/s002050050170 ↗
48. Kaufmann · New J Phys · 2011 · 13 · 05302910.1088/1367-2630/13/5/053029 ↗
49. Pitteri · Acta Mat · 1998 · 46 · 22510.1016/S1359-6454(97)00203-6 ↗