Mechanisms of grain boundary engineering
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper reports new data for the analysis of grain boundary misorientation populations and microstructure characteristics in grain boundary engineering (GBE) copper, accompanied by parallel measurements in a non-GBE control specimen of the same material. The GBE processing resulted in a doubling the number fraction of Σ3 boundaries to 41%, accompanied by a 12 times increase in Σ9. The Σ3 population has a convoluted morphology, indicating a range of boundary planes and associated mobilities, and moreover indicating that such Σ3s arise from Σ3 n interactions. Many Σ3s become incorporated into the grain boundary network. Hence, the grain boundary network is modified directly via partial replacement by Σ3s. This is termed the ‘Σ3 regeneration mechanism’. The data from the GBE copper were compared with data previously acquired from GBE brass. The brass has approximately the same number fraction of Σ3s (38%), but a lower number fraction of Σ9s and Σ27s and a markedly different microstructure where twins are not incorporated into the grain boundary network and instead the network is modified indirectly via the modification to the boundary crystallography that results from twinning. This is termed the ‘new twinning’ mechanism. It is suggested that these two mechanisms are general for all GBE metals where the GBE is based on annealing twinning. After the condition of a minimum number fraction (≈20%) of Σ3s is met, the proportion of each mechanism that operates will be governed by processing variables, e.g., cold deformation level and annealing time/temperature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Watanabe · Res Mech · 1984 · 11 · 47
2. Randle · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 406710.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.031 ↗
3. Kumar · Scr Mater · 2006 · 54 · 96110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.059 ↗
4. Palumbo · Scr Metall Mater · 1991 · 25 · 177510.1016/0956-716X(91)90303-I ↗
5. Saylor · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 364910.1016/j.actamat.2004.04.018 ↗
6. Schuh · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 68710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00447-0 ↗
7. Kumar · Mater Res Soc Symp Proc · 2004 · 819 · N7.6.1
8. Lehockey · Corros Sci · 2004 · 46 · 238310.1016/j.corsci.2004.01.019 ↗
9. www.integran.com.
10. Palumbo P. International patent C21D 8/00 8/10 C22F 1/10 1/08, No. WO 94/14986; 1994.
11. Randle · Interf Sci · 2002 · 10 · 27110.1023/A:1020877528820 ↗
12. King · 2000 · 14
13. Palumbo · Phys Status Solidi · 1992 · 131 · 42510.1002/pssa.2211310216 ↗
14. Randle · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 418710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00277-3 ↗
15. Wolf · Philos Mag A · 1992 · 66 · 99110.1080/01418619208248003 ↗
16. Randle · Ultramicroscopy · 2002 · 90 · 15310.1016/S0304-3991(01)00137-1 ↗
17. Gottstein · Acta Metall · 1984 · 32 · 111710.1016/0001-6160(84)90015-4 ↗
18. Forwood · Acta Metall · 1894 · 32 · 75710.1016/0001-6160(84)90149-4 ↗
19. Gertsman · 2002 · 387
20. Palumbo · Acta Metall · 1990 · 38 · 234310.1016/0956-7151(90)90101-L ↗
21. Lee · Mater Sci Eng A · 2003 · 354 · 10610.1016/S0921-5093(02)00919-X ↗
22. Lehockey · Metall Mater Trans A · 1998 · 29 · 38710.1007/s11661-998-0190-2 ↗
23. Randle · Metall Mater Trans A · 2002 · 33 · 185310.1007/s11661-002-0193-3 ↗
24. King · Scr Mater · 1998 · 38 · 44910.1016/S1359-6462(97)00486-7 ↗
25. Qian · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 335110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00090-9 ↗
26. Krupp · Mater Sci Eng A · 2003 · 349 · 21310.1016/S0921-5093(02)00753-0 ↗
27. Kumar · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 208110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00045-8 ↗
28. Lin · Scr Metall Mater · 1995 · 33 · 138710.1016/0956-716X(95)00420-Z ↗
29. Kim · Scr Mater · 2005 · 52 · 63310.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.11.025 ↗
30. Randle · Mater Sci Forum · 2003 · 426–432 · 355710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.426-432.3557 ↗