A phase-field model with antitrapping current for multicomponent alloys with arbitrary thermodynamic properties
Source abstract
Abstract
The development of accurate and efficient computational tools for phase transformation is a prerequisite in order to predict the microstructure evolution during phase transformation in engineering alloys. Even though the antitrapping phase-field model (PFM) has been developed and is increasingly being used for this purpose, it has been limited to dilute binary alloys. In this study, the antitrapping PFM was extended to multicomponent systems with arbitrary thermodynamic properties. We showed that at the condition of vanishing chemical potential jump, the antitrapping term in the multicomponent diffusion equation remains unchanged with the case of binary dilute alloys. We then derived the relationship between the phase-field mobility and the real interface mobility at the thin interface limit, and showed that the multicomponent effect in the relationship can be expressed in a concise matrix form.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Langer · 1986
2. Collins · Phys Rev B · 1985 · 31 · 1669
3. Caginalp · Phys Rev A · 1989 · 39 · 588710.1103/PhysRevA.39.5887 ↗
4. Kobayashi · Physica D · 1993 · 63 · 41010.1016/0167-2789(93)90120-P ↗
5. Penrose · Physica D · 1990 · 43 · 4410.1016/0167-2789(90)90015-H ↗
6. McFadden · Phys Rev E · 1993 · 48 · 201610.1103/PhysRevE.48.2016 ↗
7. Wheeler · Phys Rev A · 1992 · 45 · 742410.1103/PhysRevA.45.7424 ↗
8. Warren · Acta Metall Mater · 1995 · 43 · 68910.1016/0956-7151(94)00285-P ↗
9. Steinbach · Physica D · 1996 · 94 · 13510.1016/0167-2789(95)00298-7 ↗
10. Tiaden · Physica D · 1998 · 115 · 7310.1016/S0167-2789(97)00226-1 ↗
11. Kim · Phys Rev E · 1998 · 58 · 331610.1103/PhysRevE.58.3316 ↗
12. Kim · Phys Rev E · 1999 · 60 · 718610.1103/PhysRevE.60.7186 ↗
13. Dy · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 257310.1016/S1359-6454(97)00478-3 ↗
14. Rubin · Acta Mater · 1995 · 47 · 199510.1016/S1359-6454(99)00107-X ↗
15. Wen · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 412510.1016/S1359-6454(00)00186-5 ↗
16. Cha · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 52 · 124110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.02.026 ↗
17. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 56510.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.050 ↗
18. Chen · Phys Rev B · 1994 · 50 · 1575210.1103/PhysRevB.50.15752 ↗
19. Karma · Phys Rev E · 1994 · 49 · 224510.1103/PhysRevE.49.2245 ↗
20. Elder · Phys Rev Lett · 1994 · 72 · 67710.1103/PhysRevLett.72.677 ↗
21. Wheeler · Proc R Soc Lond A · 1996 · 452 · 49510.1098/rspa.1996.0026 ↗
22. Fan · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 61110.1016/S1359-6454(96)00200-5 ↗
23. Steinbach · Physica D · 1999 · 134 · 38510.1016/S0167-2789(99)00129-3 ↗
24. Kim · J Cryst Growth · 2004 · 261 · 13510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.09.017 ↗
25. Folch · Phys Rev E · 2005 · 72 · 01160210.1103/PhysRevE.72.011602 ↗
26. Kim · Phys Rev E · 2006 · 74 · 06160510.1103/PhysRevE.74.061605 ↗
27. Cha · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 329510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00184-7 ↗
28. Zhu · Scripta Mater · 2002 · 46 · 40110.1016/S1359-6462(02)00013-1 ↗
29. Kobayashi · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 48 · 68910.1016/S1359-6462(02)00557-2 ↗
30. Qin · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 619910.1016/S1359-6454(03)00443-9 ↗
31. Zhu · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 83310.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.017 ↗
32. Cha · J Cryst Growth · 2005 · 274 · 28110.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.10.002 ↗
33. Qin · J Cryst Growth · 2005 · 279 · 16310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.02.005 ↗
34. Eiken · Phys Rev E · 2006 · 73 · 06612210.1103/PhysRevE.73.066122 ↗
35. Böttger · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 269710.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.008 ↗
36. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 223510.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.029 ↗
37. Karma · Phys Rev Lett · 1996 · 77 · 405010.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4050 ↗
38. Karma · Phys Rev E · 1996 · 53 · R301710.1103/PhysRevE.53.R3017 ↗
39. Karma · Phys Rev E · 1998 · 57 · 432310.1103/PhysRevE.57.4323 ↗
40. Almgren · SIAM J Appl Math · 1999 · 59 · 208610.1137/S0036139997330027 ↗
41. Karma · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 87 · 11570110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.115701 ↗
42. Echebarria · Phys Rev E · 2004 · 70 · 06160410.1103/PhysRevE.70.061604 ↗
43. Amberg · Phys Rev Lett · 2003 · 91 · 26550510.1103/PhysRevLett.91.265505 ↗
44. Kim · J Cryst Growth · 2004 · 263 · 62010.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.12.003 ↗
45. Greenwood · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 93 · 24610110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.246101 ↗
46. Ramirez · Phys Rev E · 2004 · 69 · 05160710.1103/PhysRevE.69.051607 ↗
47. Ramirez · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 172110.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.021 ↗
48. Badillo · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 201510.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.025 ↗
49. Pons · Phys Rev E · 2007 · 75 · 02160210.1103/PhysRevE.75.021602 ↗
50. Chen · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 117510.1016/S1359-6454(99)00004-X ↗