Behavior of aluminum oxide, intermetallics and voids in Cu–Al wire bonds
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Nanoscale interfacial evolution in Cu–Al wire bonds during isothermal annealing from 175 °C to 250 °C was investigated by high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). The native aluminum oxide film (∼5 nm thick) of the Al pad migrates towards the Cu ball during annealing. The formation of intermetallic compounds (IMC) is controlled by Cu diffusion, where the kinetics obey a parabolic growth law until complete consumption of the Al pad. The activation energies to initiate crystallization of CuAl 2 and Cu 9 Al 4 are 60.66 kJ mol −1 and 75.61 kJ mol −1 , respectively. During IMC development, Cu 9 Al 4 emerges as a second layer and grows together with the initial CuAl 2 . When Al is completely consumed, CuAl 2 transforms to Cu 9 Al 4 , which is the terminal product. Unlike the excessive void growth in Au–Al bonds, only a few voids nucleate in Cu–Al bonds after long-term annealing at high temperatures (e.g., 250 °C for 25 h), and their diameters are usually in the range of tens of nanometers. This is due to the lower oxidation rate and volumetric shrinkage of Cu–Al IMC compared with Au–Al IMC.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Xu · J Appl Phys · 2010 · 108 · 11351710.1063/1.3514005 ↗
2. Xu · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 61 · 16510.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.03.034 ↗
3. Kim · IEEE Trans Comput Pack Technol · 2003 · 26 · 36710.1109/TCAPT.2003.815121 ↗
4. Drozdov · J Mater Sci · 2008 · 43 · 603810.1007/s10853-008-2955-9 ↗
5. Murray · Int Met Rev · 1985 · 30 · 21110.1179/imr.1985.30.1.211 ↗
6. Owen · Proc Phys Soc · 1924 · 36 · 14
7. Meetsma · J Solid State Chem · 1989 · 83 · 37010.1016/0022-4596(89)90188-6 ↗
8. Cordier · Acta Crystallogr B · 1988 · 44 · 20710.1107/S0108768187012308 ↗
9. El-Boragy · J Less-Common Met · 1972 · 29 · 13310.1016/0022-5088(72)90183-X ↗
10. Gulay · J Alloys Compd · 2004 · 367 · 10310.1016/j.jallcom.2003.08.019 ↗
11. Lee · J Alloys Compd · 2005 · 390 · 21210.1016/j.jallcom.2004.07.057 ↗
12. Braunovic · IEEE Trans Compon Pack A · 1994 · 17 · 7810.1109/95.296372 ↗
13. Campisano · Thin Solid Films · 1978 · 52 · 9710.1016/0040-6090(78)90260-2 ↗
14. Hamm · J Appl Phys · 1984 · 56 · 29310.1063/1.333960 ↗
15. Gershinskii · Thin Solid Films · 1977 · 42 · 26910.1016/0040-6090(77)90362-5 ↗
16. Swanson HE, Tatge E. Standard X-ray diffraction powder patterns. National Bureau of Standards (US), Circular; 1953. p. 539.
17. The American mineralogist crystal structure database
18. Ramachandrarao · J Mater Sci · 1974 · 9 · 43410.1007/BF00737844 ↗
19. Gulay · Z Anorgan Allgem Chem · 2003 · 629 · 46310.1002/zaac.200390076 ↗
20. Arnberg · Acta Crystallogr A · 1978 · 34 · 39910.1107/S0567739478000807 ↗
21. Tarora · J Jpn Inst Met · 1949 · 13 · 110.2320/jinstmet1937.13.9_1 ↗
22. Kurdjumov · Zh Tekh Fiziki · 1938 · 8 · 1959
23. Xu H. Thermosonic ball bonding: a study of bonding mechanism and interfacial evolution. PhD thesis. Loughborough University; 2010.
24. Diffusion in silicides: basic approach and practical application
25. Rajan · J Cryst Growth · 1980 · 49 · 29710.1016/0022-0248(80)90164-5 ↗
26. Tamou · Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res · 1992 · B64 · 130
27. Xu · Acta Metall Sin · 2007 · 43 · 125
28. Li · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 90 · 24290210.1063/1.2747673 ↗
29. Stephenson · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 266310.1016/0001-6160(88)90114-9 ↗
30. Paritskaya · Def Diffus Forum · 1996 · 79 · 129