journal article·2012-05Open access

Solute strengthening from first principles and application to aluminum alloys

G.P.M. Leyson, L.G. Hector, W.A. Curtin

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 9

Abstract

Alloys containing substitutional solutes exhibit strengthening due to favorable solute fluctuations within the alloy that hinder dislocation motion. Here, a quantitative, parameter-free model to predict the flow stress as a function of temperature and strain rate of such alloys is presented. The model builds on analytic concepts developed by Labusch but introduces key innovations rectifying shortcomings of previous models. To accurately describe the solute/dislocation interaction energies in and around the dislocation core, density functional theory and a flexible-boundary-condition method are used. The model then predicts the zero temperature flow stress, the energy barrier for dislocation motion, and thus the finite temperature flow stresses. The model is used to predict the flow stresses of various Al alloys. Excellent results are obtained for Al-Mg and Al-Mn. Al-Fe with ppm levels of Fe is not predicted well but, using experimental results for Fe, results for the quasi-binary Al-Cr-(Fe) and Al-Cu-(Fe) alloys agree well with experiments. The model is also consistent with the "stress equivalency" postulate of Basinski. This parameter-free model using first-principles input thus provides a basis for achieving the long-sought goal of computational design of alloys, within the context of solute-strengthening mechanisms. (C) 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Fleischer · Acta Metall · 1961 · 9 · 99610.1016/0001-6160(61)90242-5 ↗
2. Fleischer · Acta Metall · 1963 · 11 · 20310.1016/0001-6160(63)90213-X ↗
3. Haasen · 1996
4. Kocks · Prog Mater Sci · 1975 · 19 · 110.1016/0079-6425(75)90005-5 ↗
5. Labusch · Phys Status Solidi B · 1970 · 41 · 65910.1002/pssb.19700410221 ↗
6. N.F. Mott, F.R.N. Nabarro, in: Physical Society of Bristol Conference Report, 1948, pp. 1–19.
7. Labusch · Acta Metall · 1972 · 20 · 91710.1016/0001-6160(72)90085-5 ↗
8. Nabarro · Proc Roy Soc Lond, Ser A · 1985 · 381 · 285
9. Nabarro · Philos Mag B · 1985 · 52 · 78510.1080/13642818508240636 ↗
10. Zaiser · Philos Mag A · 2002 · 82 · 286910.1080/01418610208240071 ↗
11. Nixon · Proc Roy Soc Lond, Ser A · 1981 · 376 · 34310.1098/rspa.1981.0096 ↗
12. Olmsted · J Mech Phys Solids · 2006 · 54 · 176310.1016/j.jmps.2005.12.008 ↗
13. Schwarz · J Appl Phys · 1978 · 49 · 517410.1063/1.324413 ↗
14. Butt · J Mater Sci · 1993 · 28 · 255710.1007/BF00356192 ↗
15. Schwartz · J Appl Phys · 1978 · 49 · 517410.1063/1.324413 ↗
16. Arsenault · Metall Trans A · 1989 · 20A · 142910.1007/BF02665500 ↗
17. Lebyodkin · Acta Mater · 1996 · 44 · 453110.1016/1359-6454(96)00076-6 ↗
18. Zapperi · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 309–310 · 34810.1016/S0921-5093(00)01627-0 ↗
19. Rodary · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 70 · 054111-110.1103/PhysRevB.70.054111 ↗
20. Tapasa · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 400–401 · 10910.1016/j.msea.2005.03.057 ↗
21. Tapasa · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2006 · 14 · 115310.1088/0965-0393/14/7/004 ↗
22. Patinet · Phys Rev B · 2008 · 78 · 104109-110.1103/PhysRevB.78.104109 ↗
23. Proville · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 82 · 054115-110.1103/PhysRevB.82.054115 ↗
24. Trinkle · Science · 2005 · 310 · 166510.1126/science.1118616 ↗
25. Yasi · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 570410.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.045 ↗
26. Zander · Comput Mater Sci · 2007 · 41 · 8610.1016/j.commatsci.2007.03.013 ↗
27. Zander · Mater Des · 2008 · 29 · 154010.1016/j.matdes.2008.02.001 ↗
28. Leyson · Nat Mater · 2010 · 9 · 75010.1038/nmat2813 ↗
29. Basinski · Scripta Metall · 1972 · 6 · 80710.1016/0036-9748(72)90052-X ↗
30. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
31. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
32. Vanderbilt · Phys Rev B · 1990 · 41 · 789210.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892 ↗
33. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 45 · 1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
34. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 46 · 1294710.1103/PhysRevB.46.12947 ↗
35. Woodward · Phys Rev Lett · 2008 · 100 · 045507-1
36. Monkhorst · Phys Rev B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
37. Methfessel · Phys Rev B · 1989 · 40 · 361610.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616 ↗
38. Woodward · Phys Rev Lett · 2002 · 88 · 216402-110.1103/PhysRevLett.88.216402 ↗
39. Hirth · 1982
40. Vannarat · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 64 · 224203-110.1103/PhysRevB.64.224203 ↗
41. Argon · 2007
42. Labusch · 1975
43. Diak · Mater Sci Eng A – Struct Mater Prop · 1997 · 234 · 101910.1016/S0921-5093(97)00342-0 ↗
44. Y. Dong, J. Song, W.A. Curtin, unpublished (2011).
45. Diak · Prog Mater Sci · 1998 · 43 · 22310.1016/S0079-6425(98)00007-3 ↗
46. Diak · Private Commun · 2011
47. Nabarro · J Less Common Met · 1972 · 28 · 25710.1016/0022-5088(72)90129-4 ↗
48. Kocks · 1975
49. Hardikar · J Mech Phys Solids · 2001 · 49 · 195110.1016/S0022-5096(01)00025-4 ↗