Initiation and growth of damage in a dual-phase steel observed by X-ray microtomography
Source abstract
Abstract
In situ tensile tests have been carried out on a high-strength, dual-phase steel. These experiments show that it is possible to follow and quantify the evolution of damage nondestructively and in three dimensions in this type of material. The measurements were analyzed in terms of density, size, aspect ratio of the cavities but also of the local deformation and the stress triaxiality in the sample. It was found that damage initiation is progressive with the applied tensile strain and that the initiation of new small cavities reduces the average diameter while the growth of the previously created ones increases the average diameter. This information was used to develop a new model for void growth based on the classical Rice and Tracey approach. This simple approach was modified to account for progressive damage initiation. The results of the proposed model are in good agreement with the measurements.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Bouaziz · Mater Sci Forum · 2007 · 539 · 4210.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.539-543.42 ↗
2. Kumar · Mater Sci Eng · 2008 · A 474 · 27010.1016/j.msea.2007.05.007 ↗
3. Kang · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 56 · 99910.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.01.031 ↗
4. Rice · J Mech Phys Sol · 1969 · 17 · 20110.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
5. Gurson · J Eng Mater Technol · 1977 · 210.1115/1.3443401 ↗
6. Dutta · Int J Pres Ves Pip · 2005 · 82 · 83310.1016/j.ijpvp.2005.07.001 ↗
7. Imada · Int J Mech Sci · 2003 · 45 · 184910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2003.12.006 ↗
8. Pardoen · Acta Mater · 1997 · 46 · 54110.1016/S1359-6454(97)00247-4 ↗
9. Rakin · Eng Fract Mech · 2004 · 71 · 81310.1016/S0013-7944(03)00013-4 ↗
10. Chae · Mater Sci Eng · 2004 · A366 · 29910.1016/j.msea.2003.08.040 ↗
11. Buffiere · Acta Metall · 1999 · 47 · 1613
12. Babout · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 205510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00104-5 ↗
13. Babout · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 247510.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.001 ↗
14. Chu · J Eng Mater Technol · 1980 · 102 · 24910.1115/1.3224807 ↗
15. Wei · Int J Impact Eng · 2007 · 34 · 178010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.10.002 ↗
16. Hammi · Int J Plast · 2007 · 23 · 164110.1016/j.ijplas.2007.03.010 ↗
17. Maire · J Mech Phys Sol · 2005 · 53 · 241110.1016/j.jmps.2005.06.005 ↗
18. Martin · Scripta Mater · 2000 · 42 · 37510.1016/S1359-6462(99)00355-3 ↗
19. Everett · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 16510.1016/S1359-6462(00)00561-3 ↗
20. Di Michiel · Rev Sci Instrum · 2005 · 76 · 04370210.1063/1.1884194 ↗
21. Pyzalla · Science · 2005 · 308 · 9210.1126/science.1106778 ↗
22. Bridgeman · Rev Mod Phys · 1945 · 17 · 310.1103/RevModPhys.17.3 ↗
23. Huang · J Appl Mech · 1991 · 58 · 108410.1115/1.2897686 ↗
24. Budiansky · 1982
25. Perez · Mat Sci Eng · 2003 · A360 · 21410.1016/S0921-5093(03)00431-3 ↗