journal article·2015-05Open access

The effect of grain size on the twin initiation stress in a TWIP steel

K.M. Rahman, V.A. Vorontsov, D. Dye

Acta Materialia· Volume 89

Abstract

The influence of grain size on the twinning stress of an Fe-15Mn-2Al-2Si-0.7C Twinning Induced Plasticity (TWIP) steel has been investigated. Five grain sizes were obtained using a combination of cold rolling and annealing. Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis revealed that the material exhibited a typical cold rolled and annealed texture. Tensile testing showed the yield stress to increase with decreasing grain size, however, the ductility of the material was not substantially affected by a reduction in grain size. Cyclic tensile testing at sub-yield stresses indicated the accumulation of plastic strain with each cycle, consequently the nucleation stress for twinning was determined. The twin stress was found to increase with decreasing grain size. Furthermore, the amount of strain accumulated was greater in the coarser grain material. It is believed that this is due to a difference in the twin thickness, which is influenced by the initial grain size of the material. SEM and TEM analysis of the material deformed to 5% strain revealed thinner primary twins in the fine grain material compared to the coarse grain. TEM examination also showed the dislocation arrangement is affected by the grain size. Furthermore, a larger fraction of stacking faults was observed in the coarse-grained material. It is concluded that the twin nucleation stress and also the thickness of the deformation twins in a TWIP steel, is influenced by the initial grain size of the material. In addition grain refinement results in a boost in strength and energy absorption capabilities in the material.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Frommeyer · 1998 · 14
2. Frommeyer · ISIJ Int. · 2003 · 43 · 43810.2355/isijinternational.43.438 ↗
3. Grassel · Int. J. Plasticity · 2000 · 16 · 139110.1016/S0749-6419(00)00015-2 ↗
4. Curtze · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 512910.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.049 ↗
5. Allain · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2004 · 387 · 15810.1016/j.msea.2004.01.059 ↗
6. Bouaziz · Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2011 · 15 · 14110.1016/j.cossms.2011.04.002 ↗
7. Idrissi · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 246410.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.032 ↗
8. Guitierrez-Urrutia · Scripta Mater. · 2012
9. Venables · Philos. Mag. · 1974 · 30 · 116510.1080/14786437408207269 ↗
10. Cohen · Acta Metall. · 1963 · 11 · 99610.1016/0001-6160(63)90074-9 ↗
11. Mahajan · Acta Metall. · 1973 · 21 · 135310.1016/0001-6160(73)90085-0 ↗
12. Christian · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
13. Friedel · 1964
14. Allain · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2004 · 387–389 · 27210.1016/j.msea.2004.05.038 ↗
15. Santos · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2011 · 528 · 354510.1016/j.msea.2011.01.052 ↗
16. Kang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2010 · 527 · 74510.1016/j.msea.2009.08.048 ↗
17. Lee · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 364910.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.023 ↗
18. Gutierrez-Urrutia · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2010 · 527 · 355210.1016/j.msea.2010.02.041 ↗
19. Guitierrez-Urrutia · Scripta Mater. · 2012 · 66 · 99210.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.037 ↗
20. Dini · Mater. Design · 2010 · 31 · 339510.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.049 ↗
21. Ueji · Scripta Mater. · 2008 · 59 · 96310.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.06.050 ↗
22. Bouaziz · Scripta Mater. · 2008 · 58 · 48410.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.050 ↗
23. Oh · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1995 · 197 · 14710.1016/0921-5093(94)09751-8 ↗
24. Bleck · Steel Res. Int. · 2007 · 78 · 53610.1002/srin.200706245 ↗
25. Gallagher · Metall. Trans. · 1970 · 1 · 242910.1007/BF03038370 ↗
26. Matthies · Physica Status Solidi · 1982
27. Bracke · Scripta Mater. · 2012 · 66 · 100710.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.02.048 ↗
28. Tsuji · Scripta Mater. · 2002 · 47 · 89310.1016/S1359-6462(02)00282-8 ↗
29. Barbier · Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. · 2009 · 500 · 19610.1016/j.msea.2008.09.031 ↗
30. Lebedkina · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2009 · 519 · 14710.1016/j.msea.2009.04.067 ↗
31. Idrissi · Scripta Mater. · 2010 · 63 · 96110.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.07.016 ↗
32. Scott · Int. J. Mater. Res. · 2011 · 102 · 53810.3139/146.110508 ↗
33. Fujita · Scripta Metall. · 1975 · 9 · 63110.1016/0036-9748(75)90476-7 ↗
34. Venables · Philos. Mag. · 1961 · 9 · 37910.1080/14786436108235892 ↗
35. 1992 · 9 · 135
36. Kibey · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 684310.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.042 ↗
37. Meyers · Acta Mater. · 2001 · 49 · 402510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00300-7 ↗
38. El-Danaf · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 1999 · 30A · 122310.1007/s11661-999-0272-9 ↗
39. Gutierrez-Urrutia · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 644910.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.009 ↗
40. Renard · Scripta Mater. · 2012 · 66 · 96610.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.063 ↗
41. Potts · Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. · 1952 · 48 · 10610.1017/S0305004100027419 ↗