journal article·2000-12Open access

Correlation of simulated TEM images with irradiation induced damage

R Schäublin, P de Almeida, A Almazouzi, M Victoria

Abstract

Crystal damage induced by irradiation is investigated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) coupled to molecular dynamics (MD) calculations. The displacement cascades are simulated for energies ranging from 10 to 50 keV in Al, Ni and Cu and for times of up to a few tens of picoseconds. Samples are then used to perform simulations of the TEM images that one could observe experimentally. Diffraction contrast is simulated using a method based on the multislice technique. It appears that the cascade induced damage in Al imaged in weak beam exhibits little contrast, which is too low to be experimentally visible, while in Ni and Cu a good contrast is observed. The number of visible clusters is always lower than the actual one. Conversely, high resolution TEM (HRTEM) imaging allows most of the defects contained in the sample to be observed, although experimental difficulties arise due to the low contrast intensity of the smallest defects. Single point defects give rise in HTREM to a contrast that is similar to that of cavities. TEM imaging of the defects is discussed in relation to the actual size of the defects and to the number of clusters deduced from MD simulations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Ion-surface interactions and analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. M.A. Kirk, I.M. Robertson, J.S. Vetrano, M.L. Jenkins, L.L. Funk, in: F.H. Garner, N.H. Packan, A.S. Kumar (Eds.), Radiation-Induced Changes in Microstructure, Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium of the ASTM, STP 955, Philadephia, 1987, p. 48
2. Kiritani · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 276 · 4110.1016/S0022-3115(99)00167-1 ↗
3. Averback · Mater. Sci. Forum · 1987 · 15–18 · 96310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.15-18.963 ↗
4. Bacon · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1994 · 216 · 27510.1016/0022-3115(94)90016-7 ↗
5. Almazouzi · Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B · 1999 · 153 · 10510.1016/S0168-583X(98)00989-6 ↗
6. A. Almazouzi, M.J. Caturla, T. Diaz de la Rubia, M. Victoria, in: S.J. Zinkle, G.E. Lucas, R.C. Ewing, J.S. Williams (Eds.), Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1999, p. 685
7. Diaz de la Rubia · Phys. Rev. B · 1990 · 174 · 151
8. Flynn · Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 38 · 711810.1103/PhysRevB.38.7118 ↗
9. M. Rühle, Radiation Damage in Reactor Materials, vol. 1, International Atomic Energy Agency, 1969, p. 113
10. Eyre · J. Phys. F · 1973 · 3 · 42210.1088/0305-4608/3/2/009 ↗
11. Kiritani · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1985 · 133&134 · 8510.1016/0022-3115(85)90116-3 ↗
12. Jenkins · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1994 · 216 · 12410.1016/0022-3115(94)90010-8 ↗
13. Dai · Acta. Metall. · 1997 · 45 · 3495
14. Schäublin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 276 · 25110.1016/S0022-3115(99)00219-6 ↗
15. Daw · Phys. Rev. B · 1984 · 29 · 644310.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443 ↗
16. Cleri · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 48 · 2210.1103/PhysRevB.48.22 ↗
17. Foiles · Phys. Rev. B · 1986 · 33 · 798310.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983 ↗
18. Ercolessi · Europhys. Lett. · 1994 · 26 · 88310.1209/0295-5075/26/8/005 ↗
19. Proennecke · J. Mater. Res. · 1991 · 6 · 48310.1557/JMR.1991.0483 ↗
20. Cowley · Acta Crystallogr. · 1957 · 10 · 60910.1107/S0365110X57002194 ↗
21. Cockayne · Philos. Mag. A · 1969 · 20 · 126510.1080/14786436908228210 ↗
22. Stadelmann · Ultramicroscopy · 1987 · 21 · 13110.1016/0304-3991(87)90080-5 ↗
23. Rühle · Cryst. Lattice Def. · 1975 · 6 · 129
24. Ashby · Philos. Mag. · 1963 · 8 · 108310.1080/14786436308207338 ↗
25. R. Schäublin, X. Meng, W.M. Stobbs, Ultramicroscopy 83 (2000) 14510.1016/S0304-3991(00)00011-5 ↗