Phase stability in the Fe–Ni system: Investigation by first-principles calculations and atomistic simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
First-principles calculations of the energy of various crystal structures of Fe, Ni and ordered Fe–Ni compounds with different stoichiometries have been performed by the linearized augmented plane wave (LAPW) method in the generalized gradient approximation. The most stable compounds are L12–Ni3Fe, L10–FeNi, C11f–Ni2Fe and C11f–Fe2Ni. The L12–Ni3Fe compound has the largest negative formation energy, which is consistent with the experimental Fe–Ni phase diagram. The L10–FeNi compound has also been observed experimentally in meteorite samples as a metastable phase. It is suggested here that the C11f compounds could also form in Fe–Ni alloys at low temperatures. A new semi-empirical interatomic potential has been developed for the Fe–Ni system by fitting to experimental data and the results of the LAPW calculations. Recognizing the significance of the covalent component of bonding in this system, the potential is based on the embedded-atom method (EAM) but additionally includes a bond-angle dependence. In comparison with the existing modified EAM method, our potential form is simpler, extends interactions to several (3–5) coordination shells and replaces the screening procedure by a smooth cutoff of the potential functions. The potential reproduces a variety of properties of Fe and Ni with a reasonable accuracy. It also reproduces all stability trends across the Fe–Ni system established by the LAPW calculations. The potential can be useful in atomistic simulations of the phases of the Fe–Ni system.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rare-earth and actinide compounds · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. 1986
2. Howald · Metall Mater Trans A · 2003 · 34 · 175910.1007/s11661-003-0142-9 ↗
3. Reuter · Metall Trans A · 1989 · 20 · 71910.1007/BF02667589 ↗
4. Yang · J Phase Equilib · 1996 · 17 · 52210.1007/BF02665999 ↗
5. Grujicic · Mater Sci Eng A · 1995 · 190 · 8710.1016/0921-5093(94)09618-7 ↗
6. Meyer · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 57 · 514010.1103/PhysRevB.57.5140 ↗
7. Entel · Eur Phys J B · 1998 · 5 · 37910.1007/s100510050457 ↗
8. Daw · Phys Rev B · 1984 · 29 · 644310.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443 ↗
9. Harrison · 1989 · 219
10. Johnson · J Mater Res · 1989 · 4 · 119510.1557/JMR.1989.1195 ↗
11. Guellil · J Mater Res · 1992 · 7 · 63910.1557/JMR.1992.0639 ↗
12. Ackland · Philos Mag A · 1997 · 75 · 71310.1080/01418619708207198 ↗
13. Simonelli · Phys Status Solidi (b) · 2000 · 217 · 74710.1002/(SICI)1521-3951(200002)217:2<747::AID-PSSB747>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
14. Mendelev · Philos Mag · 2003 · 83 · 397710.1080/14786430310001613264 ↗
15. Wallenius · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 69 · 09410310.1103/PhysRevB.69.094103 ↗
16. Baskes · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 46 · 272710.1103/PhysRevB.46.2727 ↗
17. Lee · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 64 · 18410210.1103/PhysRevB.64.184102 ↗
18. Pasianot · Phys Rev B · 1991 · 43 · 695210.1103/PhysRevB.43.6952 ↗
19. Simonelli · Phys Rev B · 1994 · 50 · 72710.1103/PhysRevB.50.727 ↗
20. Simonelli · Phys Rev B · 1997 · 55 · 557010.1103/PhysRevB.55.5570 ↗
21. Ercolessi · Europhys Lett · 1994 · 26 · 58310.1209/0295-5075/26/8/005 ↗
22. Mishin · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 59 · 339310.1103/PhysRevB.59.3393 ↗
23. Baskes · Philos Mag A · 2001 · 81 · 99110.1080/01418610108214331 ↗
24. Mishin · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63 · 22410610.1103/PhysRevB.63.224106 ↗
25. Mishin · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 65 · 22411410.1103/PhysRevB.65.224114 ↗
26. Li · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 67 · 12510110.1103/PhysRevB.67.125101 ↗
27. Zope · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 68 · 02410210.1103/PhysRevB.68.024102 ↗
28. Mishin · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 145110.1016/j.actamat.2003.11.026 ↗
29. Wei · Phys Rev Lett · 1985 · 55 · 120010.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1200 ↗
30. Andersen · Phys Rev B · 1975 · 12 · 306010.1103/PhysRevB.12.3060 ↗
31. Koelling · J Phys C · 1977 · 10 · 310710.1088/0022-3719/10/16/019 ↗
32. Singh · Phys Rev B · 1991 · 43 · 638810.1103/PhysRevB.43.6388 ↗
33. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 46 · 667110.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
34. von Barth · J Phys C · 1972 · 5 · 162910.1088/0022-3719/5/13/012 ↗
35. Hohenberg · Phys Rev · 1964 · 136 · B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
36. Kohn · Phys Rev · 1965 · 140 · A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
37. Wang · Phys Rev Lett · 1985 · 54 · 185210.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1852 ↗
38. Singh · Phys Rev B · 1991 · 43 · 1162810.1103/PhysRevB.43.11628 ↗
39. Gillan · J Phys Condens Matter · 1989 · 1 · 68910.1088/0953-8984/1/4/005 ↗
40. Mehl · Phys Rev B · 2000 · 61 · 165410.1103/PhysRevB.61.1654 ↗
41. Mehl · Phys Rev B · 1993 · 47 · 249310.1103/PhysRevB.47.2493 ↗
42. Birch · J Geophys Res · 1978 · 83 · 125710.1029/JB083iB03p01257 ↗
43. Herper · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 60 · 383910.1103/PhysRevB.60.3839 ↗
44. Friak · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63 · 05240510.1103/PhysRevB.63.052405 ↗
45. Clatterbuck · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 227110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00033-8 ↗
46. Jiang · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 67 · 21410310.1103/PhysRevB.67.214103 ↗
47. Villars · 1996
48. Baskes · Phys Rev Lett · 1987 · 59 · 266610.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2666 ↗
49. Baskes · Phys Rev B · 1989 · 40 · 608510.1103/PhysRevB.40.6085 ↗
50. Baskes · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 1994 · 2 · 14710.1088/0965-0393/2/1/011 ↗
51. Rose · Phys Rev B · 1984 · 29 · 296310.1103/PhysRevB.29.2963 ↗
52. Voter · 1994
53. Kittel · 1986
54. Schepper · Phys Rev B · 1983 · 27 · 525710.1103/PhysRevB.27.5257 ↗
55. Vehanen · Phys Rev B · 1982 · 25 · 76210.1103/PhysRevB.25.762 ↗
56. Lübbenhusen · Acta Metall Mater · 1990 · 38 · 28310.1016/0956-7151(90)90058-O ↗
57. Seeger · Phys Status Solidi A · 1998 · 167 · 28910.1002/(SICI)1521-396X(199806)167:2<289::AID-PSSA289>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
58. Domain · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 65 · 02410310.1103/PhysRevB.65.024103 ↗
59. Fu · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 92 · 17550310.1103/PhysRevLett.92.175503 ↗
60. Fu · Nat Mater · 2005 · 4 · 6810.1038/nmat1286 ↗
61. Jónsson · 1998
62. Theoretical methods in condensed phase chemistry
63. Mehl · 2005
64. Yan · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 70 · 17410510.1103/PhysRevB.70.174105 ↗
65. Metals: phonon states, electron states, and Fermi surfaces, vol. 13, Landolt-Bornstein, New Series, Group III, Springer, Berlin, 1981, Part a.
66. Schaefer · Mater Sci Forum · 1987 · 15–18 · 11110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.15-18.111 ↗
67. Balluffi · J Nucl Mater · 1978 · 69–70 · 24010.1016/0022-3115(78)90247-7 ↗
68. Peterson · J Nucl Mater · 1978 · 69–70 · 310.1016/0022-3115(78)90234-9 ↗
69. Murr · 1975
70. Zimmermann · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2000 · 8 · 10310.1088/0965-0393/8/2/302 ↗
71. Tyson · Surf Sci · 1977 · 62 · 26710.1016/0039-6028(77)90442-3 ↗
72. Mittendorfer · Surf Sci · 1999 · 423 · 110.1016/S0039-6028(98)00892-9 ↗
73. Nishizawa · J Phase Equilib · 1995 · 16 · 37910.1007/BF02645344 ↗
74. Krasko · J Appl Phys · 1996 · 79 · 468210.1063/1.361703 ↗
75. Hirth · 1982
76. 1975 · vol. 12
77. Simmons · 1977
78. Lutts Gielen · Phys Status Solidi · 1970 · 41 · K8110.1002/pssb.19700410169 ↗