Chemical erosion of atomically dispersed doped hydrocarbon layers by deuterium
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The chemical erosion of atomically dispersed Ti-doped (∼10 at.%) amorphous hydrocarbon layers (a-C:H:Ti) was investigated in the temperature range of 300–800 K for 30 eV deuterium impact. Compared to pyrolytic graphite, the methane production yield is strongly reduced at elevated temperatures. This reduction starts from temperatures just above room temperature and is even larger than for B-doped graphite. The reduction of the activation energy for hydrogen release may be the dominant interpretation for the decreased hydrocarbon formation. The ratio of emitted CD 3 to CD 4 increases with temperature for pyrolytic graphite and even stronger for the doped layers. The fluence dependence of the chemical erosion yield was determined, which is explained by enrichment of the dopant due to the preferential erosion of C.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Federici · Nucl. Fusion · 2001 · 41 · 196710.1088/0029-5515/41/12/218 ↗
2. A.A. Haasz, J.A. Stephens, E. Vietzke, W. Eckstein, J.W. Dawis, Y. Hirooka, in: Nuclear Fusion Supplement, Atomic and Plasma-Material Interaction Data for Fusion, vol. 7, 1998
3. Balden · Phys. Scri. · 1999 · T81 · 6410.1238/Physica.Topical.081a00064 ↗
4. Garcı́a-Rosales · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 17310.1016/S0022-3115(00)00567-5 ↗
5. Roth · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 5110.1016/S0022-3115(98)00658-8 ↗
6. Küppers · Surf. Sci. Rep. · 1995 · 22 · 24910.1016/0167-5729(96)80002-1 ↗
7. Vietzke · 1996 · 135
8. Roth · Nucl. Fusion · 1996 · 36 · 164710.1088/0029-5515/36/12/I05 ↗
9. Corrigendum Nucl. Fusion · 1996 · 37 · 897
10. Mech · J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 84 · 165510.1063/1.368235 ↗
11. Balden · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 280 · 3910.1016/S0022-3115(00)00031-3 ↗
12. Betz · 1983 · vol. 52 · 18
13. Chen · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1995 · 227 · 6610.1016/0022-3115(95)00145-X ↗
14. Schwörer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 230 · 20810.1016/0022-3115(96)80015-8 ↗
15. Roth · Phys. Scri. · 1996 · T64 · 6710.1088/0031-8949/1996/T64/010 ↗
16. Balden · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 5210.1016/S0022-3115(00)00506-7 ↗
17. Rohde · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2002 · 149 · 20610.1016/S0257-8972(01)01497-9 ↗
18. Erents · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1976 · 63 · 39910.1016/0022-3115(76)90355-X ↗
19. Yamada · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1980 · 95 · 27810.1016/0022-3115(80)90369-4 ↗
20. Haasz · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 1986 · 4 · 117910.1116/1.573433 ↗
21. Chiu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 196–198 · 97210.1016/S0022-3115(06)80178-9 ↗
22. Grill · Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. · 1993 · 129 · 3110.1016/0168-1176(93)87026-O ↗
23. Shirai · Atom. Data Nuclear Data Tables · 2002 · 80 · 14710.1006/adnd.2001.0878 ↗
24. Vietzke · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1984 · 128&129 · 54510.1016/0022-3115(84)90408-2 ↗
25. Schwarz-Selinger · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 2001 · 19 · 10110.1116/1.1326939 ↗