Retention characteristics of hydrogen isotopes in JT-60U
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Erosion/deposition distribution and hydrogen isotope behavior in the JT-60U plasma-facing wall were investigated. Distribution of the tritium, which was produced by D–D nuclear reaction, was not correlated with erosion/deposition distribution. The tritium distribution can be explained by the distribution of high-energy tritium ion-implantation due to ripple loss. Deuterium distribution in the divertor region was different from the tritium distribution and not well correlated with the deposition. The highest D/C was ∼0.05 at the bottom of the outer dome wing, which is much less than that observed in other tokamaks. For the deuterium retention, at least two retention processes (ion-implantation and co-deposition) were found on the dome region. The systematic dust collection gave the small amount of dust (∼7 g: 0.2 mg/s production) in the whole vessel of JT-60U. Deposition was observed at the remote area of the outer divertor region.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Federici · Nucl. Fusion · 2001 · 41 · 196710.1088/0029-5515/41/12/218 ↗
2. Coad · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 22410.1016/S0022-3115(00)00479-7 ↗
3. Penzhorn · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 288 · 17010.1016/S0022-3115(00)00705-4 ↗
4. Peacock · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266 · 42310.1016/S0022-3115(98)00670-9 ↗
5. Asakura · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 18210.1016/S0022-3115(98)00818-6 ↗
6. Gotoh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 313–316 · 37010.1016/S0022-3115(02)01354-5 ↗
7. Whyte · Nucl. Fusion · 1999 · 39 · 102510.1088/0029-5515/39/8/306 ↗
8. Mayer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 38110.1016/S0022-3115(00)00486-4 ↗
9. Tanabe · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 144110.1016/S0022-3115(02)01068-1 ↗
10. Tanabe · Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 41 · 87710.13182/FST02-A22710 ↗
11. Sugiyama · Phys. Scr. · 2003 · T103 · 5610.1238/Physica.Topical.103a00056 ↗
12. Masaki · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 313–316 · 51410.1016/S0022-3115(02)01388-0 ↗
13. Tani · J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 1981 · 50 · 172610.1143/JPSJ.50.1726 ↗
14. Tobita · Nucl. Fusion · 1995 · 35 · 158510.1088/0029-5515/35/12/I20 ↗
15. Hirohata · Phys. Scr. T · 2003 · 103 · 1510.1238/Physica.Topical.103a00015 ↗
16. Hirohata · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 78510.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.031 ↗
17. Oya · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 313–316 · 20910.1016/S0022-3115(02)01451-4 ↗
18. Ochiai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 83610.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.292 ↗
19. T. Hayashi, K. Ochiai, K. Masaki, et al., J. Nucl. Mater., in preparation
20. Doyle · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1981 · 103&104 · 51310.1016/0022-3115(82)90650-X ↗
21. Tamai · J. Plasma Fusion Res. · 1998 · 74 · 1336
22. Sharpe · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2002 · 63&64 · 15310.1016/S0920-3796(02)00191-6 ↗
23. J.P. Sharpe, P.W. Humrickhouse, C.H. Skinner, et al., these Proceedings. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.09.05810.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.09.058 ↗