journal article·2013-11

Mechanical properties and microstructure evolution of CLAM Steel in tube fabrication and test blanket module assembly

Bo Huang, Qunying Huang, Yanfen Li, Chunjing Li, Qingsheng Wu, FDS Team

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 442· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

The first wall of the China dual functional lithium lead–test blanket module (DFLL–TBM) will be assembled with China low activation martensitic (CLAM) steel rectangular tubes and plates by hot isostatic pressing (HIP) – diffusion welding. The objective of this study is to evaluate CLAM rectangular tubes and investigate mechanical property and microstructure evolution of CLAM steel in tube fabrication and TBM assembly. In this work, CLAM rectangular tubes with lengths of 1500 mm were fabricated, and the dimensional accuracy met the requirement for HIP joining. In the tube fabrication process, the CLAM steel was annealed to improve its ductility. In addition, the anisotropy in mechanical properties and microstructure introduced by tube rolling was eliminated according to the simulation of HIP heat treatment in TBM preparation. The tensile strength of the CLAM tubes with final heat treatment was slightly higher than that of CLAM steel with the published standard heat treatment, while the total elongation was reduced. This revealed that a post-HIP heat treatment was required before the final heat treatment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. D’haeseleer · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2003 · 66–68 · 310.1016/S0920-3796(03)00388-0 ↗
2. Gambier · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2009 · 84 · 13810.1016/j.fusengdes.2009.01.041 ↗
3. Toshihide · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2009 · 84 · 12210.1016/j.fusengdes.2009.02.029 ↗
4. Shimomura · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2005 · 74 · 910.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.08.004 ↗
5. Holtkamp · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2007 · 82 · 42710.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.03.029 ↗
6. Wu · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2007 · 82 · 189310.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.08.012 ↗
7. Wu · Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · 153310.1088/0029-5515/47/11/015 ↗
8. Wu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 141010.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.04.031 ↗
9. Wu · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2006 · 81 · 271310.1016/j.fusengdes.2006.07.068 ↗
10. Wu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 162910.1016/S0022-3115(02)01272-2 ↗
11. Huang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 14210.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.153 ↗
12. Huang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 40010.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.158 ↗
13. Li · Plasma Fusion Res. · 2010 · 5 · S1036110.1585/pfr.5.031 ↗
14. Peng · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 31210.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.119 ↗
15. Li · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2007 · 82 · 262710.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.04.021 ↗
16. Li · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 11710.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.012 ↗
17. Nomoto · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2006 · 81 · 71910.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.09.037 ↗
18. Li · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 55010.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.173 ↗