journal article·2009-06Open access

Divertor heat load in ITER-like advanced tokamak scenarios on JET

G. Arnoux, P. Andrew, M. Beurskens, S. Brezinsek, C.D. Challis, P. De Vries, W. Fundamenski, E. Gauthier, C. Giroud, A. Huber, S. Jachmich, X. Litaudon, R.A. Pitts, F. Rimini

Abstract

Heat loads on the JET MarkIIHD divertor are measured by IR thermography in high triangularity plasmas with edge conditions of advanced tokamak scenarios (AT). AT scenarios operate at low density (n(e,av) < 5 x 10(19) m(-3) at JET) to maximise the non inductive current drive, leading to high target temperature (20 < T-e < 40 eV), hence high heat loads. Comparisons with a typical baseline inductive scenario (n(e,av) similar or equal to 10 x 10(19) m(-3)), show that for similar input power (similar or equal to 20 MW) the outer target heat load is higher by a factor 4 in AT scenario, and is above the limit for the ITER-like wall (ILW). Operating long pulses in AT scenarios in the ILW could then be an issue and heat load reduction using impurity seeding is investigated. (C) 2009 G. Arnoux. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Fusion materials and technologies · Superconducting Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Matthews · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241–243 · 45010.1016/S0022-3115(96)00545-4 ↗
2. Eich · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390-391 · 76010.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.202 ↗
3. Fundamenski · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 1010.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.038 ↗
4. Pitts · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 75510.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.201 ↗
5. M. Jakubowsky et al., these Proceedings.
6. Kirk · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 72710.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.198 ↗
7. Monier-Garbet · Nucl. Fus. · 2005 · 45 · 140410.1088/0029-5515/45/11/022 ↗
8. Rapp · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337–339 · 82610.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.157 ↗
9. Matthews · Phys. Scr. · 2007 · T128 · 13710.1088/0031-8949/2007/T128/027 ↗
10. Litaudon · Plasma Phys. Control Fus. · 2007 · 49 · B52910.1088/0741-3335/49/12B/S51 ↗
11. Beurskens · Nucl. Fus. · 2008 · 4810.1088/0029-5515/48/9/095004 ↗
12. Ph. Mertens et al., these Proceedings, doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.253.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.253 ↗
13. G.F. Matthews et al., on behalf of the ITER-like Wall Project Team, these Proceedings, doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.239.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.239 ↗
14. Pitts · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337–339 · 14610.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.111 ↗
15. E. Gauthier et al., in: Proceedings of the in 24th Symposium on Fusion Technology, Warsaw, Poland, 2006.
16. G. Arnoux et al., in: Proceedings of the in 34th EPS Conference on Plasma Physic and Controlled Fusion, Warsaw, Poland, 2007.
17. Herrmann · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 313–316 · 75910.1016/S0022-3115(02)01422-8 ↗
18. Herrmann · Plasma Phys.Control Fus. · 1995 · 37 · 1710.1088/0741-3335/37/1/002 ↗
19. Eich · Plasma Phys. Control Fus. · 2007 · 49 · 57310.1088/0741-3335/49/5/002 ↗
20. Andrew · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 313–316 · 13510.1016/S0022-3115(02)01586-6 ↗