Insights into the dyeing using natural indigo (Indigofera tinctoria): Toward an environmentally friendly garment
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Currently, the use of natural indigo dye has been treated as an alternative to overcome the environmental pollution caused by synthetic indigo. Irrespective of the indigo dye source, it must be reduced to its soluble form by using reducing agents in a suitable alkaline environment. Herein, bio‐sugars such as glucose or fructose were used for this purpose. The results revealed that when fructose was used instead of glucose, colour strength (K/S) values increased. In this work, cotton was cationised with water‐soluble chitosan. Water‐soluble chitosan in a wide pH range extends the use of chitosan in textiles, which otherwise is limited due to its poor water solubility at pH above 6.0. Colour fastness washing test was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of cotton cationisation. The performance of cationised samples was around 30% higher in comparison to non‐cationised samples. Moreover, in this article we have focused on integrating materials and design. We propose a garment, using natural indigo‐dyed cotton and a zero‐waste modelling approach, as a sustainable fashion product.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Textile materials and evaluations · Skin Protection and Aging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais—UEMG, Programa de Pós Graduação em Design (PPGD), Escola de Design Belo Horizonte Brazil
Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas—IPT, Laboratório de Têxteis Técnicos e Produtos de Proteção São Paulo Brazil
Funding
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico · Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.10227010.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102270 ↗
2. Comparative evaluation of various extraction methods on quantity and quality of indigo dye from Indigofera tinctoria L
3. Junejo N · 2019
4. 10.1007/s13659‐017‐0119‐910.1007/s13659‐017‐0119‐9 ↗
5. Sakthivel V · 2011 · 74
6. 10.1007/s11814‐022‐1165‐510.1007/s11814‐022‐1165‐5 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.498546710.1063/1.4985467 ↗
8. Natural dyes: an emerging ecofriendly solution for textile industries
9. 10.4172/2165‐8064.100033610.4172/2165‐8064.1000336 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.02.00910.1016/j.indcrop.2013.02.009 ↗
11. 10.1080/00405000.2021.193679310.1080/00405000.2021.1936793 ↗
12. 10.1051/matecconf/20171080300110.1051/matecconf/201710803001 ↗
13. 10.1021/es049848410.1021/es0498484 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.13031310.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130313 ↗
15. 10.1108/RJTA‐19‐02‐2015‐B00310.1108/RJTA‐19‐02‐2015‐B003 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10570‐020‐03361‐w10.1007/s10570‐020‐03361‐w ↗
17. 10.1039/D0TB01865A10.1039/D0TB01865A ↗
18. Purnawati I · 2017 · 237
19. 10.13189/cme.2014.02040210.13189/cme.2014.020402 ↗
20. 10.1177/0040517522112731510.1177/00405175221127315 ↗
21. 10.1039/D1GC02043A10.1039/D1GC02043A ↗
22. 10.1080/00405000.2020.180595210.1080/00405000.2020.1805952 ↗
23. 10.20885/teknoin.vol27.iss1.art210.20885/teknoin.vol27.iss1.art2 ↗
24. 10.1080/15440478.2022.213426310.1080/15440478.2022.2134263 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.10210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.102 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.09.01010.1016/j.carbpol.2006.09.010 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.09410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.094 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10854310.1016/j.matdes.2020.108543 ↗
29. 10.3390/su1307368610.3390/su13073686 ↗
30. 10.1016/C2011‐0‐05518‐710.1016/C2011‐0‐05518‐7 ↗
31. Nursari F · 2019 · 98
32. Comparison between cotton and silk fabric dyed with turmeric natural colorant. DIU
33. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.19910.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.199 ↗
34. 10.1038/nchembio.255210.1038/nchembio.2552 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10924‐017‐1026‐110.1007/s10924‐017‐1026‐1 ↗
36. 10.1177/0040517522114351910.1177/00405175221143519 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10295‐019‐02223‐010.1007/s10295‐019‐02223‐0 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10924‐016‐0900‐610.1007/s10924‐016‐0900‐6 ↗
39. 10.1016/B978‐0‐85709‐843‐6.00003‐210.1016/B978‐0‐85709‐843‐6.00003‐2 ↗
40. 10.1111/j.1478‐4408.2003.tb00179.x10.1111/j.1478‐4408.2003.tb00179.x ↗
41. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1030‐1032.41810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1030‐1032.418 ↗
42. Correlation of morphological characteristics with the presence of indicant in Indigofera sp. dyestuff
43. Treatment of cotton with chitosan and its effect on dyeability with reactive dyes
44. 10.1111/j.1478‐4408.2004.tb00215.x10.1111/j.1478‐4408.2004.tb00215.x ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.04.07210.1016/j.jcis.2019.04.072 ↗
46. Influence of cationization of cotton on reactive dyeing
47. 10.3390/su1219817410.3390/su12198174 ↗
48. Ashby MF · 2016
49. 10.3390/su1401045210.3390/su14010452 ↗
50. Fletcher K · 2012
51. 10.1080/17543266.2016.116725310.1080/17543266.2016.1167253 ↗
52. 10.1007/978‐981‐10‐0566‐4_510.1007/978‐981‐10‐0566‐4_5 ↗
53. 10.1108/JFMM‐12‐2014‐009510.1108/JFMM‐12‐2014‐0095 ↗
54. 10.1002/cb.155910.1002/cb.1559 ↗
55. 10.3390/su1211468010.3390/su12114680 ↗
56. 10.4324/9781003089063-510.4324/9781003089063-5 ↗
57. 10.1002/9781119423898.ch210.1002/9781119423898.ch2 ↗
58. 10.1177/0887302X1247272410.1177/0887302X12472724 ↗
59. 10.19080/CTFTTE.2019.04.55564810.19080/CTFTTE.2019.04.555648 ↗