journal article·2015-08

Active control of divertor heat and particle fluxes in EAST towards advanced steady state operations

L. Wang, H.Y. Guo, J. Li, B.N. Wan, X.Z. Gong, X.D. Zhang, J.S. Hu, Y. Liang, G.S. Xu, X.L. Zou, A. Loarte, R. Maingi, J.E. Menard, G.N. Luo, X. Gao, L.Q. Hu, K.F. Gan, S.C. Liu, H.Q. Wang, R. Chen, Z. Sun

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Significant progress has been made in EAST towards advanced steady state operations by active control of divertor heat and particle fluxes. Many innovative techniques have been developed to mitigate transient ELM and stationary heat fluxes on the divertor target plates. It has been found that lower hybrid current drive (LHCD) can lead to edge plasma ergodization, striation of the stationary heat flux and lower ELM transient heat and particle fluxes. With multi-pulse supersonic molecular beam injection (SMBI) to quantitatively regulate the divertor particle flux, the divertor power footprint pattern can be actively modified. H-modes have been extended over 30 s in EAST with the divertor peak heat flux and the target temperature being controlled well below 2 MW/m 2 and 250 °C, respectively, by integrating these new methods, coupled with advanced lithium wall conditioning and internal divertor pumping, along with an edge coherent mode to provide continuous particle and power exhaust.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Fusion materials and technologies · Superconducting Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Gormezano · Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · S28510.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S06 ↗
2. Loarte · Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · S20310.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S04 ↗
3. Wang · Nucl. Fusion · 2013 · 53 · 07302810.1088/0029-5515/53/7/073028 ↗
4. Eich · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 21050110.1103/PhysRevLett.107.215001 ↗
5. Wang · Nucl. Fusion · 2014 · 54 · 11400210.1088/0029-5515/54/11/114002 ↗
6. Liang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 23500210.1103/PhysRevLett.110.235002 ↗
7. R. Chen et al., U.S. Transport Task Force Workshop, San Antonio, US, 2014.
8. Zheng · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2013 · 55 · 11501010.1088/0741-3335/55/11/115010 ↗
9. X.L. Zou et al., 24th IAEA FEC, San Diego, US, PD/P8-08, 2012.
10. Mansfield · Nucl. Fusion · 2013 · 53 · 11302310.1088/0029-5515/53/11/113023 ↗
11. J.S. Hu et al., This Conference.
12. R. Maingi et al., 25th IAEA FEC, St. Petersburg, Russia, Oct. 13–18, 2014.
13. Li · Nat. Phys. · 2013 · 9 · 81710.1038/nphys2795 ↗
14. Morris · Nat. Phys. · 2013 · 9 · 75410.1038/nphys2825 ↗
15. Wang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 112 · 18500410.1103/PhysRevLett.112.185004 ↗
16. Snyder · Nucl. Fusion · 2013 · 47 · 96110.1088/0029-5515/47/8/030 ↗
17. Wan · Nucl. Fusion · 2000 · 40 · 105710.1088/0029-5515/40/6/304 ↗
18. Wan · Nucl. Fusion · 2013 · 53 · 10400610.1088/0029-5515/53/10/104006 ↗
19. Wang · Nucl. Fusion · 2012 · 52 · 06302410.1088/0029-5515/52/6/063024 ↗
20. Gan · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S36410.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.069 ↗
21. Stangeby · 2000
22. Z. Sun et al., Fusion Eng. Des. (in press).
23. Guo · Nucl. Fusion · 2014 · 54 · 01300210.1088/0029-5515/54/1/013002 ↗
24. Evans · Nat. Phys. · 2006 · 2 · 41910.1038/nphys312 ↗
25. Rack · Nucl. Fusion · 2014 · 54 · 06401610.1088/0029-5515/54/6/064016 ↗
26. Xiao · Nucl. Fusion · 2014 · 54 · 02300310.1088/0029-5515/54/2/023003 ↗
27. Guo · Phys. Plasmas · 2014 · 21 · 05610710.1063/1.4872195 ↗
28. Ide · Nucl. Fusion · 2005 · 45 · S4810.1088/0029-5515/45/10/S05 ↗