journal article·2012-12

A reevaluation of radiation damage cross sections

W. Lu, F.X. Gallmeier, P.J. Geoghegan, P.D. Ferguson, M.S. Wechsler

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 431· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In the past years, INC models simulating spallation reactions have been undergoing considerable development, and their results are more and more scrutinized by experimental work. Recently, IAEA has led an international collaboration to independently benchmark various INC models. The preliminary results of this collaboration indicate that while the Bertini model performs well in predicting neutron production, it greatly lacks the capability to predict light charged particle emission compared to CEM’03 and INCL. This drives us to completely reevaluate the NCSU radiation damage cross section database, which was developed 7 years ago using a combination of CEM2k and Bertini models for benchmarking experimental data. The reevaluation currently involves just the CEM’03 model in MCNPX due our limited code access. Our preliminary results are in reasonable agreement with the NCSU database for the helium and hydrogen production cross section, but there are obvious differences for the displacement cross section. Such similarities and differences are being investigated, and the validity of the CEM’03 model for predicting radiation damage to materials is being examined. The reevaluated radiation damage cross sections presented in this paper are used in calculating radiation damage to the target assembly currently running at SNS, and the results are compared with those of previous studies.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear Physics and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Lu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 356 · 28010.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.05.011 ↗
2. W. Lu, M.S. Wechsler, P.D. Ferguson, E.J. Pitcher, Spallation radiation damage calculations and database: cross-section discrepancies between the codes, J. ASTM Int. 3(7) 212–219, Paper ID JAI13467. .10.1520/JAI13467 ↗
3. Lu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 361 · 28210.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.005 ↗
4. V. McLane (Ed), ENDF-102, Data Formats and Procedures for the Evaluated Nuclear Data File ENDF-6, BNL-NCS-44945-01/04-Rev., National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, 2001.10.2172/781830 ↗
5. M.B. Chadwick, P.G. Young, S. Chiba, S.C. Frankle, G.M. Hale, H.G. Hughes, A.J. Koning, R.C. Little, R.E. MacFarlane, R.E. Prael, L.S. Waters, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 131 (1999) 293–328. See also, LA-UR-98-1825, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1998.10.13182/NSE98-48 ↗
6. Trumbull · Nucl. Data Sheets · 2006 · 107 · 293110.1016/j.nds.2006.11.001 ↗
7. S.G. Mashnik, A.J. Sierk, CEM2k – Recent developments in CEM, in: Proceedings of 2000 ANS/ENS International Meeting, Nuclear Applications of Accelerator Technology (AccApp00), Washington DC, USA, November 12–16, 2000.
8. Mashnik · J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2006 · 41 · 34010.1088/1742-6596/41/1/037 ↗
9. Boudard · Phys. Rev. · 2002 · C66 · 044615
10. A. Kelic, M.V. Ricciardi, K.-H. Schmidt, Results of the de-excitation code, in: Proceedings of the Joint ICTP-IAEA Advanced Workshop on Model Codes for Spallation Reactions, ICTP Trieste, Italy, February 4–8, 2008, IAEA INDC(NDS)-530, Vienna, August 2008, p. 181. .
11. Allison · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2006 · 53 · 27010.1109/TNS.2006.869826 ↗
12. IAEA, Benchmark of Spallation Models, .
13. Bertini · Phys. Rev. · 1963 · 131 · 180110.1103/PhysRev.131.1801 ↗
14. Bertini · Phys. Rev. · 1969 · 188 · 171110.1103/PhysRev.188.1711 ↗
15. D.B. Pelowitz, MCNPX User’s Manual, Version 2.6.0, Report LA-CP-07-1473, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 2008.
16. Bieri · Helv. Phys. Acta · 1962 · 553
17. Green · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1988 · 155–157 · 135010.1016/0022-3115(88)90525-9 ↗
18. Michel · Nucl. Instrum. Methods B · 1995 · 103 · 18310.1016/0168-583X(95)00566-8 ↗
19. Oliver · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 147110.1016/S0022-3115(02)01295-3 ↗
20. Leya · Nucl. Instrum. Methods · 1998 · B145 · 44910.1016/S0168-583X(98)00528-X ↗
21. Alard · Nuovo Cimento · 1975 · A30 · 32010.1007/BF02730175 ↗
22. Michel · Nucl. Instrum. Methods · 1989 · B42 · 7610.1016/0168-583X(89)90013-X ↗
23. B. Dittrich, U. Herpers, R. Bodemann, M. Lupke, R. Michel, P. Signer, R. Wieler, H. Hofmann, W. Woelfli, Nuclear Energy Agency Nuclear Data Committee Report (E)-312-U, 1990, 53.
24. Schaeffer · Phys. Rev. · 1959 · 113 · 67410.1103/PhysRev.113.674 ↗
25. K. Goebel, H. Schultes, J. Zahringer, Report CERN, vol. 64(12), 1964.10.2307/1120494 ↗
26. Enke · Nucl. Phys. A · 1999 · 657 · 31710.1016/S0375-9474(99)00345-0 ↗
27. Hilscher · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 296 · 8310.1016/S0022-3115(01)00501-3 ↗
28. Garner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 296 · 6610.1016/S0022-3115(01)00562-1 ↗
29. Ammon · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2008 · 266 · 210.1016/j.nimb.2007.10.024 ↗
30. Dubost · J. Phys. · 1967 · 28 · 25710.1051/jphys:01967002803-4025700 ↗
31. Leya · Nucl. Instr. Meth. in Phys. Res. B · 2005 · 229 · 110.1016/j.nimb.2004.11.009 ↗
32. F. Gallmeier, The Light Charged Particles Benchmark Evaluation, 2nd Advanced Workshop on Model Codes for Spallation Reactions, Saclay, France, February 8–11, 2010.
33. Norgett · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 1975 · 33 · 5010.1016/0029-5493(75)90035-7 ↗