Modeling detachment physics in the NSTX snowflake divertor
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The snowflake divertor is a proposed technique for coping with the tokamak power exhaust problem in next-step experiments and eventually reactors, where extreme power fluxes to material surfaces represent a leading technological and physics challenge. In lithium-conditioned National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) discharges, application of the snowflake divertor typically induced partial outer divertor detachment and severalfold heat flux reduction. UEDGE is used to analyze and compare conventional and snowflake divertor configurations in NSTX. Matching experimental upstream profiles and divertor measurements in the snowflake requires target recycling of 0.97 vs. 0.91 in the conventional case, implying partial saturation of the lithium-based pumping mechanism. Density scans are performed to analyze the mechanisms that facilitate detachment in the snowflake, revealing that increased divertor volume provides most of the parallel heat flux reduction. Also, neutral gas power loss is magnified by the increased wetted area in the snowflake, and plays a key role in generating volumetric recombination.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Fusion materials and technologies · Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Loarte · Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · S20310.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S04 ↗
2. Gray · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S36010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.029 ↗
3. Menard · Nucl. Fusion · 2012 · 52 · 08301510.1088/0029-5515/52/8/083015 ↗
4. Menard · Nucl. Fusion · 2011 · 51 · 10301410.1088/0029-5515/51/10/103014 ↗
5. Ryutov · Phys. Plasmas · 2007 · 14 · 06450210.1063/1.2738399 ↗
6. Ryutov · Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion · 2012 · 54 · 12405010.1088/0741-3335/54/12/124050 ↗
7. Soukhanovskii · Nucl. Fusion · 2011 · 51 · 01200110.1088/0029-5515/51/1/012001 ↗
8. Soukhanovskii · Phys. Plasmas · 2012 · 19 · 08250410.1063/1.4737117 ↗
9. Soukhanovskii · Phys. Plasmas · 2009 · 16 · 02250110.1063/1.3068170 ↗
10. Soukhanovskii · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 09502510.1088/0029-5515/49/9/095025 ↗
11. Rognlien · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 196 · 34710.1016/S0022-3115(06)80058-9 ↗
12. Rognlien · Fusion Eng. Design · 2002 · 60 · 49710.1016/S0920-3796(02)00005-4 ↗
13. S.I. Braginskii, Transport processes in a plasma, in: M.A. Leontovitch, (Ed.), Rev. Plasma Phys., vol. 1, Consultants Bureau, New York, NY, 1965, pp. 205–311.
14. Wising · Contrib. Plasma. Phys. · 1996 · 36 · 30910.1002/ctpp.2150360238 ↗
15. LRDFIT software. .
16. Ryutov · Contrib. Plasma Phys. · 2012 · 52 · 53910.1002/ctpp.201210046 ↗
17. Kotschenreuther · Phys. Plasmas · 2007 · 14 · 07250210.1063/1.2739422 ↗
18. T.D. Rognlien, et al., 56th Annual Meeting of the APS-DPP, New Orleans, LA, 2014.
19. LeBlanc · Rev. Sci. Instrum · 2003 · 74 · 165910.1063/1.1532763 ↗
20. Bell · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2006 · 77 · 10E90210.1063/1.2217012 ↗
21. McLean · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2012 · 83 · 05370610.1063/1.4717672 ↗
22. Soukhanovskii · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2003 · 74 · 209410.1063/1.1537042 ↗
23. Canik · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S40910.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.11.084 ↗
24. Stangeby · 2000
25. Reiter · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241 · 34210.1016/S0022-3115(96)00526-0 ↗
26. Meier · Phys. Plasmas · 2012 · 19 · 07250810.1063/1.4736975 ↗
27. Taylor · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S77710.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.09.049 ↗
28. F. Scotti, Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, 2014.
29. Rognlien · Phys. Plasmas · 1999 · 6 · 185110.1063/1.873488 ↗
30. Chankin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241 · 19910.1016/S0022-3115(96)00505-3 ↗
31. Rozhansky · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 02500710.1088/0029-5515/49/2/025007 ↗
32. Rozhansky · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2013 · 55 · 03500510.1088/0741-3335/55/3/035005 ↗
33. Janev · Nucl. Fusion · 1989 · 29 · 10910.1088/0029-5515/29/1/015 ↗