journal article·2003-05

Application of the local fracture stress model on the cleavage fracture of the reactor pressure vessel steels in the transition temperature region

Won-Jon Yang, Bong-Sang Lee, Moo-Young Huh, Jun-Hwa Hong

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 317· Issue 2-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The fracture toughness in the ductile–brittle transition region of reactor pressure vessel steels was evaluated by means of an RKR-type model which describes the temperature dependence of the cleavage fracture toughness based on the constant fracture stress σ f . The fracture stress σ f and the characteristic distance are two main parameters in the RKR model. In order to apply the RKR model to the transition temperature region, these two parameters were investigated in different manners. In this study, the local fracture stress, σ f ∗ , was determined from the pre-cracked specimens. The results showed that the local fracture stress σ f ∗ determined from the pre-cracked specimens was higher than the fracture stress σ f from the notched specimens, while those values were practically independent of the temperatures. The CID (cleavage initiation distance), which represents the distance from the crack tip to the cleavage initiation site, was measured in every fractured specimen. The measured CID values were strongly dependent on the test temperatures. Besides, the fracture toughness K JC in the transition region was dependent on the measured CID. The RKR model, when the local fracture stress σ f ∗ and the measured CIDs were applied, could describe the temperature dependency of the median transition fracture toughness K JC(med) .
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Malkin · Eng. Frac. Mech. · 1971 · 3 · 131
2. Ritchie · Metall. Trans. A · 1976 · 7A · 83110.1007/BF02644080 ↗
3. Ritchie · Metall. Trans. A · 1978 · 9A · 33110.1007/BF02646382 ↗
4. Curry · Met. Sci. · 1980 · 14 · 31910.1179/msc.1980.14.8-9.319 ↗
5. Chen · Metall. Trans. · 1992 · 22A · 2287
6. Chen · Metall. Trans. · 1992 · 23A · 50910.1007/BF02801168 ↗
7. Wang · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 1996 · 27A · 190910.1007/BF02651940 ↗
8. Parks · J. Eng. Mater. Technol. · 1976 · 98 · 3010.1115/1.3443332 ↗
9. Rawal · Metall. Trans. A · 1977 · 8A · 69110.1007/BF02664778 ↗
10. Rack · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 1976 · 24 · 16510.1016/0025-5416(76)90109-9 ↗
11. Hill · 1950
12. Griffith · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1971 · 19 · 41910.1016/0022-5096(71)90009-3 ↗
13. Wang · Fatigue Frac. Eng. Mater. Struct. · 1999 · 22 · 84910.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00222.x ↗
14. Bowen · Acta Metall. · 1986 · 34 · 112110.1016/0001-6160(86)90222-1 ↗
15. Richie · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1973 · 21 · 39510.1016/0022-5096(73)90008-2 ↗
16. Wallin · Eng. Frac. Mech. · 1984 · 19 · 108510.1016/0013-7944(84)90153-X ↗
17. Wallin · Eng. Frac. Mech. · 1985 · 22 · 14910.1016/0013-7944(85)90167-5 ↗
18. ASTM standard E 1921-97, 1997, Determination of Reference Temperature, T0, for Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range, 1997
19. J.D. Landes, D.H. Shaffer, ASTM STP 700, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1980, p. 368
20. Weibull · J. Appl. Mech. · 1953 · 18 · 29310.1115/1.4010337 ↗
21. Chen · Acta. Metall. Mater. · 1990 · 38 · 252710.1016/0956-7151(90)90264-H ↗
22. McMeeking · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1977 · 25 · 35710.1016/0022-5096(77)90003-5 ↗
23. Rice · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1968 · 16 · 110.1016/0022-5096(68)90013-6 ↗
24. Hutchinson · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1968 · 16 · 1310.1016/0022-5096(68)90014-8 ↗
25. Rice · 1970 · 641
26. Curry · Met. Sci. · 1976 · 10 · 110.1179/030634576790431453 ↗