Helium production for 0.8–2.5 GeV proton induced spallation reactions, damage induced in metallic window materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Production cross-sections for neutrons and charged particles as well as excitation energy distributions in spallation reactions were measured recently by the NESSI-collaboration and have been employed to test different intra nuclear cascade models and the subsequent evaporation. The INCL/GEMINI code, which describes best the experimental data has been employed to calculate the damage cross-sections in Fe and Ta as well as the He/dpa ratio as a function of proton energy. For the same amount of neutron production in a typical target of a spallation neutron source the proton beam induced radiation damage in an Fe window is shown to decrease almost linearly with proton energy. For heavier materials such as Ta a similar decrease of the radiation damage is found only for energies above about 3 GeV.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. The European Spallation Source Study, vol. III, The ESS Technical Study, Report ESS-96-53-M, 1996
2. Spallation Neutron Source at Oak Ride, TN, USA, http://www.sns.gov/documentation/pubs.htm
3. Ullmaier · Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B · 1995 · 101 · 40610.1016/0168-583X(95)00590-0 ↗
4. Ullmaier · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 251 · 26210.1016/S0022-3115(97)00226-2 ↗
5. S.A. Maloy et al., in: Third International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Applications of Accelerator Technology, Long Beach, CA, 14–18 November 1999, p. 541
6. Letourneau · Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B · 2000 · 170 · 29910.1016/S0168-583X(00)00259-7 ↗
7. Hilscher · Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A · 1998 · 414 · 10010.1016/S0168-9002(98)00531-2 ↗
8. D. Filges et al., to be published
9. M. Enke et al., Nucl. Phys. A 657 (1999) 317, and references [4–8, 27–34] therein10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00345-0 ↗
10. C.-M. Herbach et al., in: Proceedings of SARE-5 Meeting, 17–21 July 2000, OECD, Paris, France
11. Wlazlo · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 573610.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5736 ↗
12. Michel · Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B · 1995 · 103 · 18310.1016/0168-583X(95)00566-8 ↗
13. H. P. Wellisch, D. Axen, Phys. Rev. C 54 (1996) 1329, revised by R.E. Prael, M.B. Chadwick, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Report LA-UR-97-1745, 199710.1103/PhysRevC.54.1329 ↗
14. M.H. Barnett, M.S. Wechsler et al., these Proceedings, p. 54
15. Biersack · Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. · 1980 · 174 · 25710.1016/0029-554X(80)90440-1 ↗
16. Kinchin · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1955 · 18 · 110.1088/0034-4885/18/1/301 ↗
17. P. Jung, Landolt-Börnstein, New Series III/25 (1991) 1, and references therein
18. D. Filges et al., Report ESS 96-45-T, 199610.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb10215.x ↗