Deuterium retention in W, W1%La, C-coated W and W2C
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper reports the results of a systematic investigation into retention of deuterium implanted into various forms of W including: reduction-rolled, powder-metallurgy foil; discs of W1%La alloy; W and W2C prepared by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and annealed C-coated W discs. Deuterium was implanted at energies of 0.5 keV/D with fluxes of ∼ 3×10 19 D / m 2 s and fluences of 3×10 23 D / m 2 , for samples at temperatures from 23°C to 400°C. Retained deuterium quantities were measured using thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS). Retention in annealed CVD-W and W1%La, for implantation temperatures less than 200°C, is below that in annealed W foil, indicating that trapping may be affected by the different material defect structures. For implantation temperatures less than 300°C, retention in CVD-W2C is somewhat higher than that in CVD-W, indicating trapping could be enhanced by trace carbon impurities, differences in W2C material structure and recoil carbon-induced material damage. Implantation into C-coated W resulted in orders of magnitude more retention than in uncoated material, because of trapping in the carbon coating.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderl · Fus. Technol. · 1992 · 21 · 74510.13182/FST92-A29837 ↗
2. H. Eleveld et al., in: Proceedings of the 16th Symposium On Fusion Technology, SOFT, London, 1990, p. 376
3. Eleveld · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 191–194 · 43310.1016/S0022-3115(09)80082-2 ↗
4. Alimov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 240 · 7510.1016/S0022-3115(96)00442-4 ↗
5. Fransen · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241–243 · 1012
6. Davis · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1995 · 223 · 31210.1016/0022-3115(95)00041-0 ↗
7. Haasz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241–243 · 107610.1016/S0022-3115(97)80197-3 ↗
8. Haasz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 258–263 · 88910.1016/S0022-3115(98)00072-5 ↗
9. Haasz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 52010.1016/S0022-3115(98)00586-8 ↗
10. Causey · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 46710.1016/S0022-3115(98)00538-8 ↗
11. Schleussner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 129610.1016/S0022-3115(98)00570-4 ↗
12. Sze · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 121210.1016/S0022-3115(98)00636-9 ↗
13. M. Poon et al., J. Nucl. Mater 283–287 (2000) 106210.1016/S0022-3115(00)00167-7 ↗
14. Nagata · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 115110.1016/S0022-3115(98)00520-0 ↗
15. Horikawa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 109110.1016/S0022-3115(98)00518-2 ↗
16. Fransens · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1991 · 3 · 9871
17. Frauenfelder · Sci. Technol. · 1969 · 388
18. Yoshida · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 19710.1016/S0022-3115(98)00817-4 ↗