Investigation of Zircaloy-2 oxidation model for SFP accident analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The authors previously conducted thermogravimetric analyses on Zircaloy-2 in air. By using the thermogravimetric data, an oxidation model was constructed in this study so that it can be applied for the modeling of cladding degradation in spent fuel pool (SFP) severe accident condition. For its validation, oxidation tests of long cladding tube were conducted, and computational fluid dynamics analyses using the constructed oxidation model were proceeded to simulate the experiments. In the oxidation tests, high temperature thermal gradient along the cladding axis was applied and air flow rates in testing chamber were controlled to simulate hypothetical SFP accidents. The analytical outputs successfully reproduced the growth of oxide film and porous oxide layer on the claddings in oxidation tests, and validity of the oxidation model was proved. Influence of air flow rate for the oxidation behavior was thought negligible in the conditions investigated in this study.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Combustion and Detonation Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Trégourès · 2015
2. Nishimura · 2013
3. Lindgren · 2007
4. Lindgren · 2008
5. Adorni · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2016 · 307 · 41810.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.07.016 ↗
6. Steinbrück · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2006 · 236 · 170910.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.04.010 ↗
7. Stuckert · Ann. Nucl. Energy · 2016 · 93 · 410.1016/j.anucene.2015.12.034 ↗
8. Beuzet · Ann. Nucl. Energy · 2016 · 93 · 1810.1016/j.anucene.2015.12.031 ↗
9. Natesan · 2004
10. Duriez · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 380 · 3010.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.07.002 ↗
11. Duriez · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2009 · 239 · 24410.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.10.017 ↗
12. Steinbrück · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 392 · 53110.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.04.018 ↗
13. Steinbrück · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 414 · 27610.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.012 ↗
14. Steinbrück · Oxid. Met. · 2016 · 85 · 24510.1007/s11085-015-9572-1 ↗
15. Idarraga · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 421 · 16010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.11.071 ↗
16. Nakayama · J. Jpn. Inst. Met. · 1967 · 31 · 83910.2320/jinstmet1952.31.7_839 ↗
17. Nakamura · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 200 · 25610.1016/0022-3115(93)90336-W ↗
18. Arima · Prog. Nucl. Eng. · 2009 · 51 · 30710.1016/j.pnucene.2008.08.001 ↗
19. Coindreau · J. Nucl. Mater · 2010 · 405 · 20710.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.07.038 ↗
20. Beuzet · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2011 · 241 · 121710.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.04.024 ↗
21. Stuckert · Ann. Nucl. Energy · 2016 · 93 · 410.1016/j.anucene.2015.12.034 ↗
22. Boase · Nucl. Tech. · 1977 · 32 · 6010.13182/NT77-A31738 ↗
23. Steinbrück · 2013
24. Nemoto · 2015
25. Nemoto · 2016
26. Y. Nemoto, Y. Kaji, C. Ogawa, K. Nakashima, M. Tojo, Zairyo-to-Kankyo, (2017), in press, in Japanese.
27. JIS H4751 (1998), in Japanese.
28. D. Goto, K. Kobayashi, M. Tojo, T. Ikehara, Y. Kaji, Y. Nemoto, 2015 Fall Meeting of the Atomic Energy Scociety of Japan, F03 (2015), in Japanese.
29. JIS R6001 (1973), in Japanese.
30. Cassinese · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 91510.1103/PhysRevB.62.13915 ↗
31. Chen · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 1
32. CD-adapco Inc · 2015
33. Lasserre · Mater. Corros. · 2014 · 65 3 · 25010.1002/maco.201307078 ↗
34. Lasserre · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 462 · 22110.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.03.052 ↗
35. Maeng · 2015
36. Suzuki · 2011
37. Steinbrück · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 447 · 4610.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.12.024 ↗
38. Sung · 2015
39. Große · 2016 · vol. 3 · 2103
40. Steinbrück · 2016 · vol. 1 · 535