journal article·2011-07

Bulk properties and photoelectron spectroscopy of the ζ-U–Pu phase

Ladislav Havela, Anna Adamska, Rachel Eloirdi, Eric Colineau, Jean-Christophe Griveau, Thomas Gouder, Frank Huber, Daniel Bouexière, Alexander B. Shick

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 414· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The ζ-phase, existing between 35% and 70% U in Pu, belongs to the high-density phases seen from the point of view of systematics of allotropic modifications of Pu metal. Despite the volume per actinide atom only slightly higher than for α-Pu, it magnetic susceptibility is much higher than for α-Pu and exceeds even the δ-Pu value. Similarly, the Sommerfeld coefficient γ > 40 mJ/mol Pu K2 exceeds the experimental δ-Pu value. The data confirm that the volume is not the primary control parameter affecting the situation around the Fermi level of common Pu phases and they point against the traditional belief that they are essentially narrow 5f band systems. Electronic structure calculations suggest that the 5f states of Pu have slightly lower occupancy comparing with δ-Pu. A tendency to the 5f localization can be seen in the Pu dilution situation in the photoelectron spectra.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rare-earth and actinide compounds · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Magnetic Properties of Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Marianetti · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 05640310.1103/PhysRevLett.101.056403 ↗
2. Pourovskii · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 23510710.1103/PhysRevB.75.235107 ↗
3. Lashley · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 05441610.1103/PhysRevB.72.054416 ↗
4. Shick · Europhys. Lett. · 2005 · 69 · 58810.1209/epl/i2004-10380-5 ↗
5. Havela · J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 07E13010.1063/1.3062946 ↗
6. Havela · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 285 · 2810.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.09.039 ↗
7. Ellinger · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1959 · 3 · 23310.1016/0022-3115(59)90019-4 ↗
8. Lawson · Acta. Crystallogr. · 1996 · B52 · 3210.1107/S0108768195006811 ↗
9. King · Cryogenics · 1963 · 3 · 17710.1016/0011-2275(63)90013-4 ↗
10. Bachman · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1972 · 43 · 20510.1063/1.1685596 ↗
11. 2006
12. Meot-Reymond · J. Alloy. Compd. · 1996 · 232 · 11910.1016/0925-8388(95)01937-5 ↗
13. Baclet · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 03510110.1103/PhysRevB.75.035101 ↗
14. Javorský · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 15640410.1103/PhysRevLett.96.156404 ↗
15. Havela · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 15514010.1103/PhysRevB.82.155140 ↗
16. Lashley · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 20590110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.205901 ↗
17. Lashley · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 63 · 22451010.1103/PhysRevB.63.224510 ↗
18. Naegele · 1985 · 59–60 · 197
19. Havela · J. Alloy. Compd. · 1992 · 181 · 20510.1016/0925-8388(92)90313-X ↗
20. Sarma · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1987 · 63–64 · 50910.1016/0304-8853(87)90650-0 ↗
21. Gouder · Surf. Sci. · 1997 · 382 · 2610.1016/S0039-6028(97)00088-5 ↗
22. Fuggle · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1980 · 45 · 159710.1103/PhysRevLett.45.1597 ↗
23. Havela · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 23511810.1103/PhysRevB.65.235118 ↗
24. Terry · Surf. Sci. · 2002 · 499 · L14110.1016/S0039-6028(01)01757-5 ↗
25. Naegele · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1984 · 52 · 183410.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1834 ↗
26. Gouder · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 337810.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3378 ↗
27. Björkman · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 24510110.1103/PhysRevB.78.245101 ↗
28. Arko · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 177310.1103/PhysRevB.62.1773 ↗
29. 2006
30. Wimmer · Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 24 · 86410.1103/PhysRevB.24.864 ↗
31. Shick · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 08510610.1103/PhysRevB.80.085106 ↗