Microstructures and hardness of as-quenched martensites (0.1–0.5%C)
Source abstract
Abstract
Four commercial steels with carbon contents in the range 0.1-0.5 wt.% have been examined in the as-quenched condition using electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and atom probe tomography. The austenite had been deformed 0%, 10% and 30% prior to brine quenching. No influence of this deformation was evident on the martensite hardness or in any of the microstructure measurements. Increasing carbon content showed a well-known marked effect on the hardness but resulted in little refinement in the grain structure of the martensite. All crystal structures were cubic; no evidence of tetragonality was seen even at the highest carbon level but some systematic changes in grain boundary misorientations existed. The content of carbon in true interstitial solid solution deduced from X-ray line shifts was small (similar to 0.02 wt.%), and was independent of the total carbon content in the steel. Atom probe tomography showed that carbon was almost completely segregated to lath boundaries and dislocations but with an increasing density of segregates in the higher carbon steels. Calculations of diffusion distances confirmed that the segregation patterns were compatible with autotempering of the martensite during quenching. Analysis of different possible contributions to strength leads to the conclusion that segregated carbon atoms at defects behave similarly to carbon in true solid solution and that this is the largest single factor controlling the strength of as-quenched martensite. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Roberts · J Metals · 1953 · 5 · 203
2. Bain · Trans AIME · 1924 · 70 · 25
3. Zener · Trans AIME · 1946 · 167 · 550
4. King · JISI · 1958 · 188 · 61
5. Speich · Trans AIME · 1969 · 245 · 2553
6. Speich · Met Trans · 1972 · 3 · 104310.1007/BF02642436 ↗
7. Kelly · Proc Roy Soc · 1960 · A259 · 4510.1098/rspa.1960.0210 ↗
8. Marder · Trans ASM · 1969 · 60 · 651
9. Maki · Trans ISIJ · 1980 · 20 · 209
10. Maki · 2007 · 1
11. Morris · ISIJ Int · 2008 · 48 · 106310.2355/isijinternational.48.1063 ↗
12. Krauss · ISIJ Int · 1995 · 35 · 34910.2355/isijinternational.35.349 ↗
13. Christian · 1971 · 261
14. Winchell · Trans ASM · 1962 · 55 · 347
15. Gourges · Mater Sci Technol · 2000 · 16 · 2610.1179/026708300773002636 ↗
16. Lagneborg · Metal Science · 1975 · 9 · 22610.1179/030634575790444496 ↗
17. Hutchinson B, Hagström J, Karlsson O, Lindell D, Sörensen M, Komenda J, et al. Swerea-KIMAB, Stockholm, Open Report 2010-133.
18. Burns · Trans AIME · 1934 · 113 · 239
19. Wriedt · Trans AIME · 1962 · 224 · 1242
20. Hume-Rothery · 1966
21. Bhadeshia · 2001
22. Pereloma · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 58 · 107810.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.02.002 ↗
23. Hono · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 97710.1016/S1359-6462(00)00690-4 ↗
24. Takahashi · Acta Mater; · 2010 · 58 · 360210.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.030 ↗
25. Bunge · J Appl Cryst · 2003 · 36 · 13710.1107/S0021889802021386 ↗
26. Morito · ISIJ Int · 2003 · 43 · 147510.2355/isijinternational.43.1475 ↗
27. Hansen · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 182710.1016/S1359-6454(97)00365-0 ↗
28. Stephenson · Trans ASM · 1962 · 55 · 624