journal article·2007-06

Twinning and texture development in two Mg alloys subjected to loading along three different strain paths

L. Jiang, J.J. Jonas, R.K. Mishra, A.A. Luo, A.K. Sachdev, S. Godet

Acta Materialia· Volume 55· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The evolution of twinning and texture in two Mg-based (+Al, Mn, Zn) alloys was investigated using uniaxial tension, uniaxial compression and ring hoop tension testing at temperatures from ambient to 250 °C and a strain rate of 0.1 s−1. The results indicate that the initial extrusion texture plays an important role in the formation of different types of twins and that the twinning behavior also depends on the strain path. Contraction and double twinning are the dominant twinning mechanisms in uniaxial tension, while extension twinning prevails in uniaxial compression and ring hoop tension testing. Schmid factor analysis indicates that only components that are favorably oriented (i.e., with the highest SF values) can undergo rapid and complete twinning. The different twinning behaviors are shown to be responsible for the sharply contrasting strain hardening characteristics of the experimental flow curves and dramatic texture changes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Reed-Hill · Trans AIME · 1957 · 209 · 496
2. Wonsiewicz · Trans AIME · 1967 · 239 · 1422
3. Obara · Acta Metall · 1973 · 21 · 84510.1016/0001-6160(73)90141-7 ↗
4. Agnew · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 427710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00297-X ↗
5. Kocks · Prog Mater Sci · 2003 · 48 · 17110.1016/S0079-6425(02)00003-8 ↗
6. Kelley · Trans TMS-AIME · 1968 · 242 · 5
7. Ion · Acta Metall · 1982 · 30 · 190910.1016/0001-6160(82)90031-1 ↗
8. Barnett · J Light Metals · 2001 · 1 · 16710.1016/S1471-5317(01)00010-4 ↗
9. Kleiner · Mater Sci Eng · 2004 · A379 · 25810.1016/j.msea.2004.02.020 ↗
10. Jain · 2006 · 219
11. Gehrmann · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 395 · 33810.1016/j.msea.2005.01.002 ↗
12. Koike · Metall Mater Trans A · 2005 · 36 · 168910.1007/s11661-005-0032-4 ↗
13. Agnew · Duygulu Ö Int J Plast · 2005 · 21 · 116110.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.018 ↗
14. Vöhringer · Z Metall · 1970 · 67 · 518
15. Rohatgi · Metall Mater Trans A · 2001 · 32 · 13510.1007/s11661-001-0109-7 ↗
16. Kalidindi · Adv Eng Mater · 2003 · 5 · 22910.1002/adem.200300320 ↗
17. Barnett · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 509310.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.015 ↗
18. Basinski · Rev Metall · 1997 · 94 · 103710.1051/metal/199794091037 ↗
19. Mahajan · Int Metal Rev · 1973 · 18 · 4310.1179/imr.1973.18.2.43 ↗
20. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
21. Davies · Mater Sci Forum · 2005 · 495–497 · 163310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.495-497.1633 ↗
22. Brown · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 39 · 110.1016/j.msea.2005.02.016 ↗
23. Xiong · 2005 · 217
24. Wang · Test Eval · 2002 · 30 · 38210.1520/JTE12328J ↗
25. Jiang · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 77110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.029 ↗
26. Jiang L, Jonas JJ, Luo AA, Sachdev AK, Godet S. Mater Sci Eng A, in press.
27. Nave · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 51 · 88110.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.07.002 ↗
28. Bingert · Metall Mater Trans A · 2002 · 33 · 95510.1007/s11661-002-1028-y ↗
29. Barnett · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 509310.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.015 ↗
30. Godet · Script Mater · 2006 · 55 · 105510.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.07.059 ↗
31. Tomé · Mater Sci Forum · 2005 · 495–497 · 100110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.495-497.1001 ↗
32. Agnew · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 484110.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.020 ↗