journal article·2015-09Open access

Ag out-surface diffusion in crystalline SiC with an effective SiO2 diffusion barrier

H. Xue, H.Y. Xiao, Z. Zhu, V. Shutthanandan, L.L. Snead, L.A. Boatner, W.J. Weber, Y. Zhang

Abstract

For applications of tristructural isotropic (TRISO) fuel particles in high temperature reactors, release of radioactive Ag isotope (110mAg) through the SiC coating layer is a safety concern. To understand the diffusion mechanism, Ag ion implantations near the surface and in the bulk were performed by utilizing different ion energies and energy-degrader foils. High temperature annealing was carried out on the as-irradiated samples to study the possible out-surface diffusion. Before and after annealing, Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) measurements were employed to obtain the elemental profiles of the implanted samples. The results suggest little migration of buried Ag in the bulk, and an out-diffusion of the implanted Ag in the near-surface region of single crystal SiC. It is also found that a SiO2 layer, which was formed during annealing, may serve as an effective barrier to reduce or prevent Ag out diffusion through the SiC coating layer.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Lee · Science · 2010 · 329 · 131610.1126/science.1192511 ↗
2. Koehl · Nature · 2011 · 479 · 8410.1038/nature10562 ↗
3. Smart · Phys. Today · 2012 · 65 · 1010.1063/PT.3.1410 ↗
4. Hristu · Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 410.1038/srep05258 ↗
5. Castelletto · Nat. Mater. · 2014 · 13 · 15110.1038/nmat3806 ↗
6. Snead · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 448 · 38910.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.09.056 ↗
7. Snead · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 371 · 32910.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.016 ↗
8. Gao · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2008 · 20 · 125203
9. Van der Merwe · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 395 · 9910.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.09.024 ↗
10. Nabielek · Nucl. Technol. · 1977 · 35 · 48310.13182/NT35-483 ↗
11. Amian · Nucl. Technol. · 1983 · 61 · 47510.13182/NT61-475 ↗
12. Friedland · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 389 · 32610.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.02.022 ↗
13. Petti · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2003 · 222 · 28110.1016/S0029-5493(03)00033-5 ↗
14. Khalil · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 21410410.1103/PhysRevB.84.214104 ↗
15. Friedland · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 410 · 2410.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.243 ↗
16. MacLean · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 357 · 3110.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.05.043 ↗
17. Jiang · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2004 · 219 · 64210.1016/j.nimb.2004.01.134 ↗
18. Xiao · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 420 · 12310.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.09.028 ↗
19. Thevuthasan · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 1999 · 420 · 8110.1016/S0168-9002(98)00908-5 ↗
20. Zhang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 401210.1063/1.1666974 ↗
21. M. Mayer, In SIMNRA, a simulation program for the analysis of NRA, RBS and ERDA, in: The Fifteenth International Conference on the Application of Accelerators in Research and Industry, AIP Publishing, 1999, pp. 541–544.10.1063/1.59188 ↗
22. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
23. Perdew · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 46 · 667110.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
24. White · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 495410.1103/PhysRevB.50.4954 ↗
25. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
26. Vickridge · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 25610210.1103/PhysRevLett.89.256102 ↗
27. Devanathan · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 90 · 230310.1063/1.1389523 ↗
28. Weber · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 253 · 5310.1016/S0022-3115(97)00305-X ↗
29. Nason · J. Appl. Phys. · 1991 · 70 · 139210.1063/1.349547 ↗
30. Robinson · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1999 · 82 · 181710.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02004.x ↗
31. Opila · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1997 · 80 · 19710.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02810.x ↗