journal article·2009-04

Compatibility of interfaces and fibers for SiC-composites in fusion environments

C.H. Henager, R.J. Kurtz

Publisher page

Abstract

The use of SiC-composites in fusion environments is predicated on stability under neutron irradiation, on outstanding high-temperature mechanical properties, and on chemical inertness and corrosion resistance. However, SiC is susceptible to many forms of corrosion in water and in water vapor where silica formation is required as a protective layer because silica forms stable hydroxides that are volatile, even at low temperatures. SiC-composites have an additional concern that fine-grained fibers and weak interfaces provide the required fracture toughness, but these components may also exhibit susceptibility to corrosion that can compromise material properties. In this work we examine and review the compatibility of fibers and interfaces, as well as the SiC matrix, in proposed fusion environments including first wall, tritium breeding, and blanket modules and module coolants.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear materials and radiation effects

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Pint · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 115010.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.206 ↗
2. Katoh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370A · 65910.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.032 ↗
3. Henagers · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 113910.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.189 ↗
4. Zinkle · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2005 · 74 · 3110.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.08.008 ↗
5. Pint · Fus. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 47 · 85110.13182/FST05-A792 ↗
6. Hegeman · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2005 · 75–79 · 78910.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.307 ↗
7. Sha · Plasma Sci. Technol. · 2003 · 5 · 196510.1088/1009-0630/5/5/007 ↗
8. Pint · Fus. Sci. Technol. · 2003 · 44 · 43310.13182/FST03-A373 ↗
9. Katoh · Fus. Sci. Technol. · 2003 · 44 · 15510.13182/FST03-A326 ↗
10. Jones · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 105710.1016/S0022-3115(02)00976-5 ↗
11. Katoh · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2006 · 81 · 93710.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.08.045 ↗
12. Wong · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2006 · 81 · 46110.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.05.012 ↗
13. Wong · Fus. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 47 · 50210.13182/FST05-A734 ↗
14. Jacobson · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 2005 · 66 · 47110.1016/j.jpcs.2004.06.044 ↗
15. Nguyen · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2004 · 151 · 55810.1149/1.1786929 ↗
16. Opila · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2003 · 86 · 123810.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03459.x ↗
17. Levine · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2002 · 22 · 275710.1016/S0955-2219(02)00140-1 ↗
18. Fox · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2000 · 83 · 176110.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01461.x ↗
19. Opila · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1999 · 82 · 62510.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01810.x ↗
20. Opila · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1997 · 80 · 19710.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02810.x ↗
21. Jacobson · Mater. Sci. Forum · 1997 · 251–254 · 81710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.251-254.817 ↗
22. Tortorelli · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2003 · 86 · 124910.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03460.x ↗
23. More · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2003 · 86 · 127210.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03463.x ↗
24. More · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2000 · 83 · 21110.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01172.x ↗
25. Jones · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2005 · 25 · 171710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.12.015 ↗
26. Henager · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 50210.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.110 ↗
27. Opila · Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. · 2005 · 26 · 31110.1002/9780470291283.ch33 ↗
28. Henager · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 378 · 910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.03.025 ↗
29. Barringer · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2007 · 90 · 31510.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01401.x ↗
30. Kim · J. Mater. Sci. Lett. · 2003 · 22 · 58110.1023/A:1023390111074 ↗
31. Oehler · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2004 · 347 · 21110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.07.013 ↗
32. Tomozawa · Phys. Chem. Glasses · 1998 · 39 · 65
33. Nogami · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1984 · 67 · 15110.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb09634.x ↗
34. Ito · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1981 · 64 · C/16010.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb15881.x ↗
35. Yoneoka · Mater. Trans. · 2001 · 42 · 101910.2320/matertrans.42.1019 ↗
36. Barbier · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 135110.1016/S0022-3115(02)00987-X ↗
37. DiCarlo · Appl. Math. Comput. (New York) · 2004 · 152 · 47310.1016/S0096-3003(03)00570-8 ↗
38. Henager · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370A · 74210.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.088 ↗
39. Henager · Acta Mater. · 2001 · 49 · 372710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00276-2 ↗
40. Henager · Acta Mater. · 2001 · 49 · 373910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00277-4 ↗
41. Henager · 2006 · 127
42. ASTM, ASTM E 399–90, Standard Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness, Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials (ASTM, 1997).
43. Petersen · Polym. Compos. · 2007 · 28 · 31110.1002/pc.20242 ↗
44. Lewinsohn · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 283–287 · 58410.1016/S0022-3115(00)00109-4 ↗
45. Morscher · Adv. Sci. Technol. · 1999 · 22 · 331
46. Steyer · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1998 · 81 · 214010.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02598.x ↗
47. Lewinsohn · Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. · 1998 · 19 · 1110.1002/9780470294499.ch2 ↗
48. Verrilli · ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. STP · 1997 · 1309 · 158
49. Lin · Composites Part A · 1997 · 28A · 93510.1016/S1359-835X(97)00062-6 ↗
50. Evans · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1996 · 79 · 234510.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08982.x ↗
51. Kahraman · J. Mater. Sci. · 1995 · 30 · 632910.1007/BF00369684 ↗