journal article·2008-12

Changes in the mechanical properties of irradiated MgO(100) crystals investigated by nanoindentation and computer simulation

Asta Richter, Ismail Gheewala, Roger Smith, Steven D. Kenny, James Valdez, Kurt Sickafus

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 382· Issue 2-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a nanoindentation study of MgO(1 0 0) crystals by experiment and molecular dynamics simulations. The MgO crystals are Ar + irradiated up to a fluence of 10 20 Ar + /m 2 . The materials are compared both before and after irradiation by nanoindentation confirming an increase in hardness but not in the indentation modulus with increasing dose. The experimental and simulation results also indicate that radiation induced defect pinning decreases the dislocation mobility to increase hardness and to cause the material to become less brittle. Molecular dynamic simulation studies confirm the experimental observation for non-irradiated magnesia of pop-in events and slip occurring in the (1 1 0) planes which can result in pile up patterns after indentation which are dependent on crystal orientation. The slip systems can cause the injection of half planes into the upper layers, that often retract after tip removal. This feature can be attributed to the formation and partial recombination of nanocracks.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Khan · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1992 · 25 · A25710.1088/0022-3727/25/1A/039 ↗
2. Boyarskaya · J. Mater. Sci. · 1998 · 33 · 28110.1023/A:1004399125069 ↗
3. Tromas · Eur. Phys. J. AP · 1999 · 8 · 12310.1051/epjap:1999237 ↗
4. Tromas · J. Mater. Sci. · 1999 · 34 · 533710.1023/A:1004705206482 ↗
5. Terán Arce · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 83910.1063/1.1306909 ↗
6. Caceres · Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B · 2002 · 191 · 17810.1016/S0168-583X(02)00554-2 ↗
7. Richter · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 39 · 334210.1088/0022-3727/39/15/018 ↗
8. Li · Acta Mater. · 2003 · 51 · 571110.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.002 ↗
9. Christopher · Nanotechnology · 2001 · 12 · 37210.1088/0957-4484/12/3/328 ↗
10. Smith · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 245
11. Ziegler · 1985
12. Fischer-Cripps · 2002
13. Olivier · J. Mater. Res. · 1992 · 7 · 156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
14. Wolf · New J. Phys. · 2003 · 5 · 15.110.1088/1367-2630/5/1/315 ↗
15. Nowicki · Polymer · 2003 · 44 · 659910.1016/S0032-3861(03)00729-8 ↗
16. Brenner · Phys. Rev. B · 1990 · 42 · 945810.1103/PhysRevB.42.9458 ↗
17. Brenner · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 46 · 194810.1103/PhysRevB.46.1948.2 ↗
18. Uberuaga · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 10210.1103/PhysRevB.71.104102 ↗
19. Mcgee · Int. J. Mater. Res. · 2007 · 98 · 43010.3139/146.101489 ↗
20. Usov · Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B · 2005 · 240 · 66110.1016/j.nimb.2005.04.116 ↗
21. de la Fuente · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 88 · 03610110.1103/PhysRevLett.88.036101 ↗