journal article·2002-12

The zero waste option: clearance of activated and first wall/blanket materials

Andrea Ciampichetti, Paolo Rocco, Massimo Zucchetti

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Management of activated waste from fusion power reactors is part of the long-term action of the European Fusion Programme. The options of recycling , the reuse in novel reactors for in-vessel materials, and clearance , the declassification to non-active waste, for ex-vessel materials, were analysed with the aim to reduce the amount of radioactive waste. A further step is the attempt to reduce the long-term radioactivity of selected materials to levels allowing clearance also of in-vessel structures. Clearance can be an alternative option also for in-vessel materials. Vanadium-based alloys belong at the moment to the materials with sufficiently low-activation constituting elements. Attainment of clearance conditions in activated in-vessel V–4Cr–4Ti structures would require very low concentrations of impurities, not achievable with the current purification methods and in some cases below the present detection limits, and the development of methods to reprocess the activated alloy for extracting radiotoxic nuclides.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (10)

Show source-provided references
1. N.P. Taylor, I. Cook, Description of Plant Models Blanket and Structural Materials, UKAEA Fusion – Culham Report SEAFP2/5.1/UKAEA/1 (Rev.0), March 1997
2. Rocco · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 287 · 147310.1016/S0022-3115(00)00127-6 ↗
3. P. Rocco, M. Zucchetti, Integrated Approach to Recycling and Clearance, Draft Final Report – Task S5.2 – SEAFP99/S5.2/JRC/1 (Rev.1), November 1999
4. Clearance Levels for Radionuclides in Solid Materials: Application of the Exemption Principles, Interim Report for Comment, IAEA TECDOC-855, Vienna, January 1996
5. Radiation Protection 89 – Recommended Radiological Protection Criteria for the Recycling of Metals from the Dismantling of Nuclear Installations, European Commission, Directorate General Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection, 1998
6. R. Forrest, The European Activation System EASY 2001 overview, UKAEA FUS 449, 2001
7. P. Rocco, M. Zucchetti, in: Proceedings of the 21st SOFT, Madrid, Spain, September 2000, EURATOM/CIEMAT Fusion Association
8. R. Forrest, New Activation Calculations for Optimised Components of SEAFP-2 Plant Models, UKAEA Fusion – Culham Report, SEAFP2/4.1/UKAEA/7 (Rev.0), July 1998
9. Rosanvallon · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2000 · 51&52 · 60510.1016/S0920-3796(00)00250-7 ↗
10. Taylor · Fus. Technol. · 2001 · 39 · 35010.13182/FST01-A11963259 ↗