Investigation of cascade-induced re-solution from nanometer sized coherent precipitates in dilute Fe–Cu alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been used to investigate the re-solution of copper atoms from coherent, nanometer-sized copper precipitates in a body-centered cubic iron matrix. The molecular dynamics simulations used Finnis–Sinclair type interatomic potentials to describe the Fe–Cu system. Precipitate diameters of 1, 3 and 5 nm were studied, with primary knock-on atom (PKA) from 1 to 100 keV, although the majority of the cascade simulations and analysis of solute re-solution were performed for cascades of 10 or 20 keV. The simulation results provide an assessment of the re-solution on a per-atom basis as a function of precipitate size, cascade location and energy. Smaller sized precipitates, with a larger surface to volume ratio, experienced larger re-solution on a per-atom basis than larger precipitates. Re-solution was observed to occur predominantly in the initial ballistic stages of the cascades when atomic collisions occur at high kinetic energy. A minimum PKA energy of around 1 keV was required to produce re-solution, and the amount of re-solution appears to saturate for PKA energies above approximately 10 keV, indicating that the MD results are representative of the energy range of interest. A model for prompt, cascade induced solute atom re-solution has been derived, following the approach used to describe fission gas bubble re-solution, and the parameters for describing copper atom re-solution are provided.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear materials and radiation effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Busby · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 392 · 30110.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.018 ↗
2. Zinkle · Mater. Today · 2009 · 12 · 1210.1016/S1369-7021(09)70294-9 ↗
3. Allen · JOM · 2008 · 60 · 1510.1007/s11837-008-0002-6 ↗
4. Was · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 1110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.008 ↗
5. Bloom · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.02.007 ↗
6. Ehrlich · Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A · 1999 · 357 · 59510.1098/rsta.1999.0343 ↗
7. Zinkle · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2000 · 51–52 · 5510.1016/S0920-3796(00)00320-3 ↗
8. Zinkle · Phys. Plasmas · 2005 · 12 · 5810110.1063/1.1880013 ↗
9. Demkowicz · MRS Bull. USA · 2010 · 12 · 99210.1557/mrs2010.704 ↗
10. Hoagland · Philos. Mag. A · 2002 · 82 · 107310.1080/01418610208240018 ↗
11. Misra · JOM · 2007 · 59 · 6210.1007/s11837-007-0120-6 ↗
12. Chee · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 408810.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.039 ↗
13. Odette · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2008 · 38 · 47110.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130315 ↗
14. Ukai · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 39 · 77810.1080/18811248.2002.9715260 ↗
15. Larson · Scripta Mater. · 2001 · 44 · 35910.1016/S1359-6462(00)00593-5 ↗
16. Barnard · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 1
17. Jiang · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 153610.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.061 ↗
18. Alinger · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 15310.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.010 ↗
19. Fu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 22550210.1103/PhysRevLett.99.225502 ↗
20. Stoller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 251 · 4910.1016/S0022-3115(97)00256-0 ↗
21. Odette · Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids · 1998 · 44 · 18910.1080/10420159808229676 ↗
22. Odette · MRS Bull. · 2001 · 26 · 17610.1557/mrs2001.39 ↗
23. Miller · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2003 · 353 · 13310.1016/S0921-5093(02)00679-2 ↗
24. Ackland · Philos. Mag. · 1997 · 75 · 71310.1080/01418619708207198 ↗
25. de la Rubia · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1990 · 174 · 15110.1016/0022-3115(90)90229-G ↗
26. Stoller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 276 · 2210.1016/S0022-3115(99)00204-4 ↗
27. Bacon · Philos. Mag. · 2009 · 89 · 333310.1080/14786430903271377 ↗
28. Bacon · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2004 · 365 · 4610.1016/j.msea.2003.09.006 ↗
29. Becquart · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 66 · 13410410.1103/PhysRevB.66.134104 ↗
30. Calder · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 207 · 2510.1016/0022-3115(93)90245-T ↗
31. Osetsky · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 276 · 6510.1016/S0022-3115(99)00170-1 ↗
32. Soneda · Philos. Mag. A · 2001 · 81 · 33110.1080/01418610108214307 ↗
33. Marian · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2004 · 31 · 34710.1016/j.commatsci.2004.03.023 ↗
34. Wirth · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 276 · 3310.1016/S0022-3115(99)00166-X ↗
35. Osetsky · Philos. Mag. · 2003 · 83 · 362310.1080/14786430310001603364 ↗
36. Shim · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 29210.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.005 ↗
37. Nedelcu · Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2000 · 8 · 18110.1088/0965-0393/8/2/308 ↗
38. Shim · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 351 · 5610.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.021 ↗
39. Bacon · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B · 1995 · 102 · 3710.1016/0168-583X(95)80114-2 ↗
40. Nelson · Math. Phys. Sci. · 1969 · 311 · 5310.1098/rspa.1969.0099 ↗
41. Parfitt · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 392 · 2810.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.046 ↗