journal article·2017-05

Applicability of modified burst test data to reactivity initiated accident

K. Yueh

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A comprehensive irradiated cladding mechanical property dataset was generated by a recently developed modified burst test (MBT) under reactivity initiated accident (RIA) loading conditions [1,2]. The test data contains a wide range of test conditions that could bridge the gap between fast transient test reactor data (short pulse and/or low temperature) and prototypical commercial reactor conditions. This paper documents an evaluation performed to demonstrate the applicability of the MBT data to fuel cladding performance under RIA conditions. The current effort includes a comparison of calculated fuel cladding failure/burst strain for tests conducted at the Japan Atomic Energy Agency's (JAEA) Nuclear Safety Research Reactor (NSRR) to the MBT dataset, and an evaluation of potential mechanisms on how some NSRR tests survived beyond the cladding loading capacity. A simple shell model, coupled with temperature output from the Falcon fuel performance code, was used to calculate the fuel pellet thermal expansion of NSRR tests at the point of failure. The calculated fuel pellet thermal expansion correlates well directly with the MBT data at similar loading conditions. A 3-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA) model was used to evaluate fuel movement potential during a RIA. The evaluation indicates fuel relocation into the pellet chamfer and later into the dish is possible once a temperature threshold is reached before cladding failure and thus could significantly increase the fuel rod energy absorption capacity in a RIA event.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Nuclear and radioactivity studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. K. Yueh, J. Karlsson, W. Lees, D. Mitchell, and M. Quecedo, “New Techniques for the Testing of Cladding Material under RIA conditions”, Proceedings of the 2012 LWR Fuel Performance Meeting, Manchester, UK, Sep. 2-6, 2012.
2. Fuel cladding behavior under rapid loading conditions10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.11.032 ↗
3. Papin · 2003
4. Yegorova · 1999 · vol. 1
5. Boiling water reactor fuel behavior at burnup of 26 gwd/tonne U under reactivity-initiated accident conditions10.13182/NT94-A35042 ↗
6. T. Fuketa, et al., “Behavior of PWR and BWR Fuels During Reactivity-Initiated Accident Conditions,” Proceedings of the ANS International Topical Meeting on Light Water Reactor Fuel Performance, Park City, Utah, April 10-13, pp. 359–373, 2000.
7. Y, Udagawa, Tomoyuki Sugiyama1, and Masaki Amaya, “Reevaluation of Fuel Enthalpy in NSRR Test for High Burnup Fuels,” Proceedings of Water Reactor Fuel Performance Meeting 2014, Sendai, Japan, Sep. 14-17, 2014.
8. Clifford · 2015
9. Failure of Zircaloy cladding under transverse plane-strain deformation10.1016/S0029-5493(98)00284-2 ↗
10. The PROMETRA program: fuel cladding mechanical behavior under high strain rate10.13182/NT07-A3814 ↗
11. High temperature expansion due to compression test for the determination of a cladding material failure criterion under RIA loading conditions
12. Failure characteristics of cladding tubes under RIA conditions10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.03.017 ↗
13. Fracture of Zircaloy-4 cladding tubes with or without hydride blisters in uniaxial to plane strain conditions with standard and optimized expansion due to compression tests10.1016/j.msea.2014.02.075 ↗
14. Development of advanced expansion due to compression (A-EDC) test method for safety evaluation of degraded nuclear fuel cladding materials10.1080/00223131.2015.1056560 ↗
15. Failure of hydrided Zircaloy-4 under equal-biaxial and plane-strain tensile deformation
16. Behavior and failure of uniformly hydrided Zircaloy-4 fuel claddings between 25°C and 480°C under various stress states, including RIA loading conditions10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.07.001 ↗
17. Geelhood, K.J., Luscher, W.G., and Cuta J.M., “FRAPTRAN-1.5: a Computer Code for the Transient Analysis of Oxide Fuel Rods”, NUREG/CR-7023/PNNL-19400, Vol. vol. 1, Rev. 1, NRC Publication ML14295A596.
18. Geelhood, K.J. and Luscher, W.G., “FRAPTRAN-1.5: Integral Assessment”, NUREG/CR-7023/PNNL-19400, Vol. vol. 2, Rev. 1, NRC Publication ML14295A633.
19. Behavior of 60 to 78 MWd/KgU PWR fuels under reactivity-initiated accident conditions10.1080/18811248.2006.9711198 ↗
20. M. Petit, V. Georgenthum, T. Sugiyama, M. Quecedo, and J. Desquines, “A Comparative Analysis of CABRI CIP0-1 and NSRR VA-2 Reactivity Initiated Accident Tests”, Proceedings of EUROSAFE Towards Convergence of Technical Nuclear Safety Practice in Europe Meeting, Berlin, Germany, November 5-6, 2007.
21. JAERI-Research 2001-054 · 2001
22. Kamimura · 2003
23. V. Grigoriev, R. Jakobsson, D. Schrire, G. Ledergerber, T. Sugiyama, F. Nagase, T. Fuketa, L. Hallstadius, and S. Valizadeh, “RIA Failure of High Burn-up Fuel Rods Irradiated in KKL: Out-of-Pile Mechanical Simulation and Comparison with Pulse Reactor Tests”, Proceedings of the 16th ASTM Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry Meeting, Chengdu, China, 2010.10.1520/STP49392T ↗
24. EPRI Product 1022711 · 2012
25. 2013
26. Dependence on strain rate and temperature shown by yield stress of uranium dioxide10.1080/18811248.1976.9734063 ↗
27. Geelhood · 2008
28. Siefken · 1993 · vol. IV