journal article·2017-01

Effect of oxygen defects on thermal conductivity of thorium-cerium dioxide solid solutions

Hiroaki Muta, Hirohisa Kado, Yuji Ohishi, Ken Kurosaki, Shinsuke Yamanaka

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Thermal conductivity of thorium-cerium dioxide solid solutions has been measured and analyzed using the relaxation time approximation. Despite the presence of oxygen defects, the partially reduced Th 0.8 Ce 0.2 O 1.97 exhibited higher thermal conductivity than the stoichiometric one, Th 0.8 Ce 0.2 O 2.00 , showing the same tendency as that previously reported for Th 0.7 Pu 0.3 O 2-δ . The increase in thermal conductivity with the oxygen defects can be explained by assuming that cerium ions have an average ionic radius of the ionic radii of Ce 3+ and Ce 4+ in the description of phonon–impurity scattering. This result indicates that the small reduction of (Th,Pu)O 2-δ fuel increases the thermal conductivity, especially at high temperatures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Thorium fuel utilization: options and trends, A. Stanculescu, IAEA TECDOC 1319, Vienna (2002).
2. Potential of thorium based fuel cycles to constrain plutonium and reduce long lived waste toxicity, A. Stanculescu, IAEA TECDOC 1349,Vienna (2003).
3. Thorium fuel cycle – potential benefits and challenges, F. Sokolov, K. Fukuda, H.P. Nawada, IAEA TECDOC 1450, Vienna (2005).
4. Thermophysical properties database of materials for light water reactors and heavy water reactors, IAEA TECDOC 1496, Viena (2006).
5. Introduction of thorium in the nuclear fuel cycle, OECD/NEA No. 7224 (2015).
6. Claparede · Inorg. Chem. · 2011 · 50 · 1170210.1021/ic201699t ↗
7. Akabori · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 1994 · 31 · 53910.1080/18811248.1994.9735188 ↗
8. Kutty · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 327 · 21110.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.02.007 ↗
9. Hingant · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 385 · 40010.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.011 ↗
10. Muta · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 434 · 12410.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.10.044 ↗
11. Ohyanagi · Scr. Mater. · 2004 · 50 · 11110.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.09.027 ↗
12. Muta · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 389 · 18610.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.027 ↗
13. Yeo · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 433 · 6610.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.09.015 ↗
14. Muta · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 50 · 18110.1080/00223131.2013.757468 ↗
15. Osaka · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 408 · 28510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.11.065 ↗
16. SGTE Pure Substance Database (Edition 1996) · 1996
17. Introduction to Ceramics · 1976
18. Schreiber · 1973
19. Shannon · Acta Crystallogr. · 1976 · A32 · 75110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
20. Klemens · Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) · 1955 · A68 · 111310.1088/0370-1298/68/12/303 ↗
21. Callaway · Phys. Rev. · 1960 · 120 · 114910.1103/PhysRev.120.1149 ↗
22. Abeles · Phys. Rev. · 1963 · 131 · 190610.1103/PhysRev.131.1906 ↗
23. Tuller · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1977 · 38 · 85910.1016/0022-3697(77)90124-X ↗
24. Chiang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 69 · 18510.1063/1.117366 ↗
25. Carbajo · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 299 · 18110.1016/S0022-3115(01)00692-4 ↗
26. Kosaka · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 49 · 96610.1080/00223131.2012.723178 ↗