Transformation behavior of the γU(Zr,Nb) phase under continuous cooling conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The selected alloy for designing a high-density monolithic-type nuclear fuel with U–Zr–Nb alloy as meat and Zry-4 as cladding, has to remain in the γU(Zr,Nb) phase during the whole fabrication process. Therefore, it is necessary to define a range of concentrations in which the γU(Zr,Nb) phase does not decompose under the process conditions. In this work, several U alloys with concentrations between 28.2–66.9 at.% Zr and 0–13.3 at.% Nb were fabricated to study the possible transformations of the γU(Zr,Nb) phase under different continuous cooling conditions. The results of the electrical resistivity vs temperature experiments are presented. For a cooling rate of 4 °C/min a linear regression was determined by fitting the starting decomposition temperature as a function of Nb concentration. Under these conditions, a concentration of 45.3 at.% Nb would be enough to avoid any transformation of the γU(Zr,Nb) phase. In experiments that involve higher cooling conditions, it has been determined that this concentration can be halved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Travelli, Proceedings of XVIII International meeting on Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors (RERTR), 1995, Reference Number: 35044365.
2. J.P. Durand, Y. Lavastre, P. Colomb, Proceedings of XVIII International Meeting RERTR, 1995, Reference Number: 35044396.
3. J.P. Durand, P. Laudamy, K. Richter, Proceedings of XVII International Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors (RERTR), 1994, pp. 191–203.
4. J.L. Snelgrove, G.L. Hofman, C.L. Trybus, T.C. Wiencek, Proceedings of XIX International Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors (RERTR), 1996, Reference number: 35089110.
5. Bleiberg · J. Appl. Phys. · 1956 · 27 · 127010.1063/1.1722250 ↗
6. Massalski · 1996
7. Akabori · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1995 · 7 · 8249
8. Akabori · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 188 · 24910.1016/0022-3115(92)90480-9 ↗
9. A.A. Bauer, 1959, Internal Report No.: BMI-1350, Batelle Memorial Institute.
10. Basak · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 416 · 28010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.06.011 ↗
11. Basak · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 393 · 14610.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.05.018 ↗
12. Basak · Intermetallics · 2009 · 18 · 170710.1016/j.intermet.2010.05.006 ↗
13. A.E. Dwight, M. Mueller, Report of the Metallurgy Program 3.1.5, 1957, Report Number: ANL-5581.
14. Tangri · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1965 · 15 · 27810.1016/0022-3115(65)90076-0 ↗
15. Lopes · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2013 · 265 · 61910.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.09.024 ↗
16. R.H. Cooper Jr., Oak Ridge Report Number Y-1984.
17. W. Graus, G. Nolze, U. Müller, Powder cell23 – Pulverdiffraktogramme aus Einkristalldaten und Anpassung experimenteller Beugungsauf nahmen. .