First-principles study of helium trapping in cementite Fe3C
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We report a first-principles density functional theory study of helium distribution in cementite Fe 3 C. The solution energy of interstitial He is similar to that in bcc Fe; by contrast, the substitutional He (replacing Fe) is remarkably (0.74 eV) more stable than in the latter, due to the easiness of Fe vacancy formation in Fe 3 C. Therefore, He is predicted to be significantly more soluble in cementite than in Fe matrix. We find the binding potencies of both a substitutional–interstitial He pair (0.21 eV) and a substitutional–substitutional He pair (0.22 eV) are noticeably weaker in cementite than in bcc Fe, indicating a less powerful self-trapping. As a consequence, small size cementite in ferritic steels might serve as scattered trapping centers for He, mitigate helium bubble growth, and make the steel more swelling resistant while under neutron irradiation, just as dispersed oxide particles do.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear materials and radiation effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Kohyama · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 233–237 · 13810.1016/S0022-3115(96)00327-3 ↗
2. Huang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · 210.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.12.039 ↗
3. Wilson · Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 24 · 561610.1103/PhysRevB.24.5616 ↗
4. Seletskaia · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 9410.1103/PhysRevLett.94.046403 ↗
5. Jiang · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81
6. Kurtz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333
7. Smith · Scr. Mater. · 2000 · 43 · 95710.1016/S1359-6462(00)00521-2 ↗
8. Tian · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 407 · 20010.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.10.016 ↗
9. Berg · Solid State Commun. · 1977 · 24 · 19310.1016/0038-1098(77)90605-6 ↗
10. Fu · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 7210.1103/PhysRevB.72.064117 ↗
11. Ono · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 150710.1016/S0022-3115(02)01268-0 ↗
12. Hao · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. · 2012 · 24
13. Hao · Nucl. Inst. Method. Phys. Res. B · 2011 · 269 · 142810.1016/j.nimb.2011.04.007 ↗
14. Hao · Nucl. Inst. Method. Phys. Res. B · 2012 · 280 · 2210.1016/j.nimb.2012.02.027 ↗
15. Hsiung · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 8210.1103/PhysRevB.82.184103 ↗
16. Erhart · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 11110.1063/1.4707944 ↗
17. Smith · 2006
18. Song · Acta Mater. · 2005 · 53 · 84510.1016/j.actamat.2004.10.051 ↗
19. Song · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2006 · 441 · 110.1016/j.msea.2006.08.095 ↗
20. Yu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 425 · 14010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.052 ↗
21. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
22. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
23. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
24. Wood · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2004 · 37 · 8210.1107/S0021889803024695 ↗
25. Jiang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103
26. Yan · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110
27. Ehrlich · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2001 · 56–57 · 7110.1016/S0920-3796(01)00236-8 ↗
28. Stoller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 233–237 · 99910.1016/S0022-3115(96)00261-9 ↗
29. Stoller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 251 · 4910.1016/S0022-3115(97)00256-0 ↗
30. Nelson · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1968 · 25 · 22710.1016/0022-3115(68)90047-0 ↗
31. Stoller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · 67410.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.11.015 ↗
32. Golubov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 361 · 14910.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.032 ↗