Effect of load ratio on fatigue crack propagation behavior of solid-solution-strengthened Ni-based superalloys at elevated temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The fatigue crack propagation (FCP) behavior of two solid-solution-strengthened Ni-based superalloys, INCONEL 617 and HAYNES 230, were studied simultaneously in laboratory air using a constant stress intensity factor ( K )-controlled mode with different load ratios ( R -ratio) at 700 °C. The FCP tests were performed in both cycle and time-dependent FCP domains to examine the effect of R -ratio on the FCP rate, da/dn . For cycle-dependent FCP test, a 1-s sinusoidal fatigue was applied for a compact tension (CT) specimen of INCONEL 617 and HAYNES 230 to measure their FCP rates. For time-dependent FCP test, a 3-s sinusoidal fatigue with a hold time of 300 s at maximum load was applied. Both cycle/time-dependent FCP behaviors were characterized and analyzed. The results showed that increasing R -ratio would introduce the fatigue incubation and decrease the FCP rates at cycle-dependent FCP tests. On the contrary, fatigue incubation was not observed at time-dependent FCP tests for both INCONEL 617 and HAYNES 230 at each tested R -ratio, suggesting that association of maximum load ( K max ) with crack tip open displacement (CTOD) and environmental factor governed the FCP process. Also, for time-dependent FCP, HAYNES 230 showed lower FCP rates than INCONEL 617 regardless of R -ratio. However, for cycle-dependent FCP, HAYNES 230 showed the lower FCP rates only at high R -ratios. Fracture surface of specimens were examined using SEM to investigate the cracking mechanism under cycle/time-dependent FCP condition with various R -ratios.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. DOE, A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems; 2002.
2. GIF R&D, Outlook for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems; 2009.
3. R.N. Wright, Report No. INL/EXT-06-11494; 2006.
4. Roy · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2010 · 527 · 483010.1016/j.msea.2010.04.005 ↗
5. Ma · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2012 · 43A · 49110.1007/s11661-011-0877-7 ↗
6. Ma · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2002 · 33A · 346510.1007/s11661-002-0334-8 ↗
7. Johnson · Mater. Res. Stand. · 1965 · 5 · 442
8. Tada · 2000
9. Ren · J. Pres. Ves. Technol. · 2009 · 131 · 044002-1
10. Special Metals Corporation · Inconel Alloy 617 · 2005
11. HAYNES International Inc., High Temperature Alloys Brochure; 2009.
12. Lu · Mater. Charact. · 2005 · 54 · 14910.1016/j.matchar.2004.11.003 ↗
13. Lu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2005 · 397 · 12210.1016/j.msea.2005.01.048 ↗
14. Chang · JOM · 1990 · 42 · 2910.1007/BF03220467 ↗
15. Suresh · 1998
16. Zhu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2000 · 290 · 19810.1016/S0921-5093(00)00958-8 ↗
17. Maddox · Int. J. Fract. · 1975 · 11 · 38910.1007/BF00033527 ↗
18. Hsu · J. Nucl. Sci. Tech. · 1993 · 30 · 30210.1080/18811248.1993.9734487 ↗
19. Dimopulos · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 1988 · 19 · 87310.1007/BF02628370 ↗
20. Lu · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 76710.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.044 ↗
21. Winstone · J. Mater. Sci. · 1985 · 20 · 247110.1007/BF00556076 ↗
22. Saxsena · Fatigue Eng. Mater. Struct. · 1980 · 3 · 24710.1111/j.1460-2695.1980.tb01364.x ↗