Constraining the divertor heat width in ITER
Source abstract
Abstract
A model is developed which constrains heat width, λr based on global power balance, momentum conservation, pedestal stability and sheath heat transmission. The model relies on measurements of the ratio of separatrix to pedestal pressure; a ratio ∼5% is found to be expected for ITER. Applying this model indicates a constraint that the allowed λr ∼ 10–30 mm for ITER if the divertor is in the high-recycling regime as expected ( T < 20 eV) while a λr ∼ 1–3 mm requires a separatrix pressure approximately equal to the top pedestal pressure in violation of physical reasoning and the concept of a pedestal. A weaker constraint is applied in the model that upstream separatrix temperature simultaneously satisfies power balance. The constrained model cannot satisfy power balance with λr < 3 mm, and in order to obtain λr ∼ 5 mm requires divertor plasma temperature >100 eV, a condition which would have very negative consequences for the divertor, but has never been observed experimentally.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Fusion materials and technologies · Superconducting Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Stangeby · 2000
2. Pitts · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · T138 · 01400110.1088/0031-8949/2009/T138/014001 ↗
3. Lipschultz · Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · 118910.1088/0029-5515/47/9/016 ↗
4. LaBombard · Phys. Plasma · 2011 · 18 · 05610410.1063/1.3566059 ↗
5. Eich · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 21500110.1103/PhysRevLett.107.215001 ↗
6. M. Makowski et al., Analysis of a multi-machine database on divertor heat flux, Phys. Plasmas, in press.
7. Goldston · Nucl. Fusion · 2012 · 52 · 01300910.1088/0029-5515/52/1/013009 ↗
8. Kallenbach · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337–339 · 38110.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.099 ↗
9. Snyder · Nucl. Fusion · 2011 · 51 · 10301610.1088/0029-5515/51/10/103016 ↗
10. Brunner · Sci. Instrum. · 2012 · 83 · 03350110.1063/1.3689770 ↗
11. Beurskens · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2009 · 51 · 12405110.1088/0741-3335/51/12/124051 ↗
12. Loarte · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 58710.1016/S0022-3115(98)00590-X ↗
13. Greenwald · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2002 · 44 · R2710.1088/0741-3335/44/8/201 ↗