An open-end burst test method to obtain uniaxial hoop tensile properties of fuel cladding in a hot cell
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The hoop stress–hoop strain relationship of fuel cladding is one of the essential input parameters for safety analysis of fuel rods. The three objectives of this paper were: to propose a burst test method for open-end tube specimens with the uniaxial hoop stress condition; to develop the necessary in-cell high temperature open-end burst (OEB) techniques to implement the method; and to determine the optimum specimen length for the proposed OEB test method. Silicone oil was selected as the pressurization medium, and it was sealed inside the specimens not by welding but by O-rings so that no axial tensile stress was induced in the specimens. The specimens with combined end plugs and O-rings were successfully assembled by manipulators in a hot cell, and a high temperature (⩽350 °C), high pressure (⩽100 MPa) seal was achieved. The optimum specimen length was determined by using ductile and embrittled tubes with various lengths of 30–60 mm and was found to be around 45 mm for typical BWR fuel rods. During the OEB test, internal pressure and diametral expansion were monitored to obtain the basic mechanical performance properties of the fuel cladding such as yield stress, ultimate strength, as well as the true hoop stress–hoop strain curve.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Murty · Prog. Nucl. Energy · 2006 · 48 · 32510.1016/j.pnucene.2005.09.011 ↗
2. Isaenkova · Symp. Mater. Sci. · 1995 · 8 · 34
3. Cupp · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1961 · 6 · 24110.1016/0022-3115(62)90001-6 ↗
4. Marshall · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1967 · 24 · 3410.1016/0022-3115(67)90078-5 ↗
5. D.L. Hagrman, MATPRO-Version 11, Rev. 2, NUREG/CR-0497, TREE-1280, 1981.
6. K.J. Geelhood, W.G. Luscher, C.E. Beyer, PNNL-17700, July, 2008.
7. Simada · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 327 · 9710.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.01.022 ↗
8. Hayashi · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 43 · 112810.1080/18811248.2006.9711204 ↗
9. Fan · Metall. Trans. A · 1985 · 16 · 67510.1007/BF02814242 ↗
10. Simpson · Metall. Trans. A · 1981 · 12 · 211310.1007/BF02644181 ↗
11. Bai · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 1994 · 25 · 118510.1007/BF02652293 ↗
12. Leger · Can. Met. Quart. · 1985 · 24 · 23510.1179/cmq.1985.24.3.235 ↗
13. M. Nakatsuka, K. Sakamoto, Water Reactor Fuel Performance Meeting, Paper No. 8004, Seoul, 2008.
14. R.S. Daum, S. Majumdar, H. Tsai, T.S. Bray, D.A. Koss, A.T. Motta, M.C. Billone, ASTM STP 1418, 2002, pp. 195–210.10.1520/STP10821S ↗
15. R.S. Daum, D.W. Bates, A. D.A. Koss, A.T. Motta, Int. Conf. on Hydrogen Effects on Material Behavior and Corrosion Deformation Interactions, Moran, 2002.
16. Chu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 362 · 9310.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.11.008 ↗
17. Daum · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 43 · 105410.1080/18811248.2006.9711195 ↗
18. Ishimoto · Proc. Topfuel · 2006 · 2006 · 318
19. ASTM B811-90, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 02.04, ASTM Int., (1995) 743–756.
20. M.A. Martin-Rengel, F.J. Gomez, J. Ruiz-Hervias, L. Caballero, A. Valiente, Proc. of TOPFUEL 2009, Paper 2111, 2009.
21. Kim · J. Alloys Compd. · 2007 · 431 · 15510.1016/j.jallcom.2006.05.074 ↗
22. Kim · Key Eng. Mater. · 2007 · 345-346 · 156110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.345-346.1561 ↗
23. Kim · Met. Mater. Int. · 2009 · 15 · 54710.1007/s12540-009-0547-0 ↗
24. Saux · Eng. Failure Anal. · 2010 · 17 · 68310.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.07.001 ↗
25. R.S. Daum, S. Majumda, H. Tsai, T.S. Bray, D.A. Koss, A.T. Motta, M.C. Billone, ASTM STP 1418, 2002, pp. 195–210.10.1520/STP10821S ↗
26. D. W. Bates, D.A. Koss, A.T. Motta, S. Majumdar, Inter. Topical Meeting on Light Water Fuel Performance, Park City, 2000.
27. V. Grigoriev, R. Jakobsson, D. Schrire, JAERI-Conf., 2002–009, Session 2a–3, 2002.
28. L. Ott, D. Spellman, J.G. Merkle, S. Sham, B.B. Bevard, Proc. of TOPFUEL 2009, Paper 2041, 2009.
29. Y. Ménager, A.G. Varias, Trans. 17th SMiRT, Paper C03-6 (2003).
30. Tenckhoff · ASTM STP · 1974 · 551 · 179
31. Nakatsuka · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 1987 · 24 · 90610.1080/18811248.1987.9733520 ↗
32. T. Yasuda, M. Nakatsuka, K. Yamashita, ASTM STP 939, 1987, pp. 734.10.1520/STP28156S ↗
33. Onimus · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 358 · 17610.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.07.005 ↗
34. Zulfikar · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 1992 · A158 · 185
35. M. Isaenkova, Y. Perlovich, S. Kapliy, 15th Riso Int. Symp. Mater. Sci., 1995, pp. 343–48.
36. M. Nakatsuka, K. Une, N. Tokunaga, T. Ohta, In: Proc. 2004 Int. Meeting on LWR Fuel Performance No. 1017, 2004.
37. M. Nakatsuka, S. Yagnik, J of ASTM Int, 8(1) Paper JAI102954, 2010.10.1520/JAI102954 ↗
38. K. Ogata, T. Baba, K. Kamimura, J. Matsunaga, M. Nakatsuka, K. Sakamoto, A. Sawada, In: Proc. of Top Fuel 2012, Manchester, A0136 (2012).