journal article·2005-08

Radiation damage conditions for ESS target hull and irradiation rigs

P. Vladimirov, A. Möslang

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 343· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In addition to their original mission, neutron spallation sources were also considered as a possible test bed for fusion material irradiation. Accordingly an irradiation module with 0.83 l subdivided into 10 instrumented horizontal rigs was proposed in the target–reflector interface of the ESS 5 MW long-pulse target. The irradiation conditions of this irradiation module and of the front-end target hull are given on the basis of calculations with a detailed geometry model using the neutron, photon and charged particle transport code MCNPX. Neutron and primary knock-on atom spectra, displacement damage and gas production rates as well as spallation element production rates were derived and compared with those of a fusion demonstration reactor (DEMO) and the International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility (IFMIF). In particular, it was shown that the He/dpa ratio for the ESS reflector position is between 5 and 6 in Fe-based alloys, that is about a factor of two lower than expected for the DEMO fusion reactor. While the generation of spallation products like P, S and Ca, which are known to induce structural material embrittlement, is between 40 and 90 appm per year in the ESS target hull and is comparable with their initial concentration in the alloy, their production at the reflector position is negligibly small.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. D. King (Chairman), Conclusions of the Fusion Fast Track Experts Meeting, 27 November 2001. Available from: .
2. A. Möslang, P. Vladimirov, Fusion material irradiation conditions in IFMIF and ESS, in: AccApp’03, Conference proceedings, San Diego, California, USA, 1–5 June 2003.
3. Möslang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 233
4. Bauer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 318 · 2610.1016/S0022-3115(03)00005-9 ↗
5. S.V. Gordeev, V. Heinzel, A. Möslang and V. I. Slobodtchouk, in: AccApp 03, Conference proceedings, 1–5 June 2003, San Diego, USA.
6. M. Gasparotto, G. Bauer, G. Martin, A. Möslang, N. Taylor, M. Victoria, Assessment on the possibility of neutron spallation sources to contribute to the R&D program related to material irradiation testing, The Fusion Material Irradiation Devices Expert Group, EFDA-T-RE-5.0, September 2002.
7. L.S. Waters (Ed.), MCNPXTM Users Manual, Version 2.1.5, TPO-E83-G-UG-X-00001, Rev. 0, November 14, 1999.
8. J.F. Briesmeister (Ed.), MCNP – A general Monte Carlo N-particle transport code, Version 4C, LA-13709-M, Los Alamos National Laboratory, April 2000.
9. U. Fischer, D. Leichtle, H. Tsige-Tamirat, Neutronics characteristics of a solid breeder blanket for a fusion power demonstration reactor, in: Annual Meeting on Nuclear Technology, Karlsruhe, ISSN 0720-9207, 1999, p. 553.
10. Silberberg · Astrophys. J. · 1998 · 501 · 91110.1086/305862 ↗
11. Sümmerer · Phys. Rev. C · 2000 · 61 · 03460710.1103/PhysRevC.61.034607 ↗
12. Michel · Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B · 1995 · 103 · 18310.1016/0168-583X(95)00566-8 ↗