Effect of homogenization and hot rolling on the mechanical properties, microstructure and corrosion behavior of U–10Mo monolithic fuel
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Corrosion behavior is an important consideration in the fuel qualification process. No prior study comprehensively evaluated the corrosion behavior of uranium-10 wt percent (wt%) molybdenum alloy for use in U.S. High Performance Research Reactors with the current composition, thermomechanical processing methods, dimension, cladding material, interface, research reactor water chemistry, temperature, and flow conditions. Hence, this work was performed to obtain baseline information about the corrosion behavior of DU-10Mo (depleted uranium-10 wt% molybdenum) alloy as a function of fabrication parameters (homogenization and hot rolling) using deionized water in a non-flow condition at 23 °C and 75 °C. Electrochemical and immersion corrosion testing were performed to determine the corrosion behavior of DU-10Mo hot-rolled foils. Microhardness testing, optical microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy were performed to evaluate the effect of fabrication parameters on DU-10Mo.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Limiting the use of highly enriched uranium in domestically licensed research reactors
2. Snelgrove · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 1997 · 178 · 11910.1016/S0029-5493(97)00217-3 ↗
3. Meyer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 304 · 22110.1016/S0022-3115(02)00850-4 ↗
4. Burkes · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2009 · 40 · 106910.1007/s11661-009-9805-5 ↗
5. Prabhakaran · JOM · 2017 · 69 · 252910.1007/s11837-017-2612-3 ↗
6. Meyer · Nucl. Eng. Technol. · 2014 · 46 · 16910.5516/NET.07.2014.706 ↗
7. 1988
8. Holden · 1968
9. Kim · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 245 · 17910.1016/S0022-3115(97)00011-1 ↗
10. Parida · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 2001 · 62 · 58510.1016/S0022-3697(00)00219-5 ↗
11. Okamoto · 1992 · vol. 3
12. Bostrom · 1955
13. Cohen · 1955
14. Burkart · 1957
15. Bleiberg · 1957
16. Burkes · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2010 · 240 · 133210.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.02.008 ↗
17. Burkes · J. Alloy. Comp. · 2009 · 479 · 14010.1016/j.jallcom.2008.12.063 ↗
18. Hilton · 2000
19. Robinson · 2009
20. Delegard · 2008
21. 2014
22. Senor · 2014
23. Nyberg · 2013
24. Prabhakaran · 2016
25. ASTM E384 · 2016
26. ASTM G5 · 2014
27. ASTM/NACE-TM0169/G31 · 2012
28. ASTM G1 · 2011
29. ASTM G3 · 2010
30. ASTM G102 · 2015
31. Nyberg · 2014
32. Joshi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 465 · 80510.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.065 ↗
33. Joshi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 465 · 71010.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.07.005 ↗
34. Bostrom · 1956
35. Xu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2016 · 471 · 15410.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.11.026 ↗
36. Gomozov · Transl. Atomnaya Energiya · 1974 · 37 · 423
37. Henager · 2014
38. Chen · Corros. Sci. · 2013 · 66 · 14210.1016/j.corsci.2012.09.012 ↗
39. Bairi · Corros. Sci. · 2010 · 52 · 229110.1016/j.corsci.2010.03.018 ↗
40. Sedriks · 1979
41. McCullough · Trans. Am. Soc. Met. · 1951 · 43 · 404
42. Kuang · Electrochim. Acta · 2014 · 127 · 7910.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.011 ↗
43. Bradley · Inorg. Chem. · 1962 · 1 · 68310.1021/ic50003a047 ↗
44. Mance · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1969 · 31 · 25210.1016/0022-3115(69)90221-9 ↗
45. Pray · 1957
46. Kubose · 1968
47. Macki · 1971