Hydrodynamic effects of eroded materials of plasma-facing component during a Tokamak disruption
Source abstract
Abstract
Loss of plasma confinement causes surface and structural damage to plasma-facing materials (PFMs) and remains a major obstacle for tokamak reactors. The deposited plasma energy results in surface erosion and structural failure. The surface erosion consists of vaporization, spallation, and liquid splatter of metallic materials, while the structural damage includes large temperature increases in structural materials and at the interfaces between surface coatings and structural members. Comprehensive models (contained in the HEIGHTS computer simulation package) are being used self-consistently to evaluate material damage. Splashing mechanisms occur as a result of volume bubble boiling and liquid hydrodynamic instabilities and brittle destruction mechanisms of nonmelting materials. The effect of macroscopic erosion on total mass losses and lifetime is evaluated. The macroscopic erosion products may further protect PFMs from severe erosion (via the droplet-shielding effect) in a manner similar to that of the vapor-shielding concept.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. A. Hassanein, I. Konkashbaev, Theory and models of material erosion and lifetime during plasma instabilities in a tokamak environment, in: Presented at the Fifth International Symposium on Fusion Technology (ISFNT-5), 19–24 September 1999, Rome, Italy, Fus. Eng. Design (to be published)
2. Hassanein · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 273 · 32610.1016/S0022-3115(99)00052-5 ↗
3. Hassanein · Fus. Technol. · 1996 · 30 · 71310.13182/FST96-A11963020 ↗
4. Hassanein · Suppl. J. Nucl. Fus. · 1994 · 5 · 193
5. Belan · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 233–237 · 76310.1016/S0022-3115(96)00011-6 ↗
6. V. Litunovsky et al., in: B. Beaumont, P. Libeyre, B. de Gentile, G. Tonon (Eds.), Fusion Technology, 1998, p. 59
7. Arkhipov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 233–237 · 76710.1016/S0022-3115(96)00014-1 ↗
8. Hassanein · Fus. Technol. · 1989 · 15 · 51310.13182/FST89-A39751 ↗
9. V. Litunovsky et al., in: 16th IEEE/NPSS Symposium on Fusion Engineering, September 30–October 5, Champaign, IL, 1995, p. 43510.1109/FUSION.1995.534257 ↗
10. Burtseva · Plasma Devices Operations · 1995 · 4 · 3110.1080/10519999508226613 ↗
11. J. Linke et al., in: B. Keen, M. Huguet, R. Hemsworth (Eds.), Fusion Technology, 1991, p. 428
12. Van der laan · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1989 · 162–164 · 96410.1016/0022-3115(89)90394-2 ↗
13. A.V. Burdakov et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 233–237 (1996) 69710.1016/S0022-3115(96)00015-3 ↗
14. Hassanein · J. Nucl. Mater · 1996 · 233–237 · 71310.1016/S0022-3115(96)00213-9 ↗
15. A. Hassanein et al., in: K. Herschbach, W. Maurer, J.E. Vetter (Eds.), Fusion Technology, 1994, p. 223
16. V. Litunovsky et al., in: Proceedings of the 20th Symposium on Fusion Technology (SOFT), 7–11 September, Marseille, France 1, 1998, p. 59