Detection and quantification of solute clusters in a nanostructured ferritic alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A series of simulated atom probe datasets were examined with a friends-of-friends method to establish the detection efficiency required to resolve solute clusters in the ferrite phase of a 14YWT nanostructured ferritic alloy. The size and number densities of solute clusters in the ferrite of the as-milled mechanically-alloyed condition and the stir zone of a friction stir weld were estimated with a prototype high-detection-efficiency (∼80%) local electrode atom probe. High number densities, 1.8 × 1024 m−3 and 1.2 × 1024 m−3, respectively of solute clusters containing between 2 and 9 solute atoms of Ti, Y and O and were detected for these two conditions. These results support first principle calculations that predicted that vacancies stabilize these Ti–Y–O– clusters, which retard diffusion and contribute to the excellent high temperature stability of the microstructure and radiation tolerance of nanostructured ferritic alloys.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Fusion materials and technologies · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Klueh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 378 · 15910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.05.010 ↗
2. Murty · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 383 · 18910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.08.044 ↗
3. Odette · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2008 · 38 · 47110.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130315 ↗
4. Nanstad · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 392 · 33110.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.022 ↗
5. Guerin · MRS Bull. · 2009 · 34 · 10
6. Odette · JOM · 2010 · 62 · 8410.1007/s11837-010-0144-1 ↗
7. Schneibel · Scr. Mater. · 2009 · 61 · 79310.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.06.034 ↗
8. McClintock · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 392 · 35310.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.024 ↗
9. Miller · Mater. Sci. Forum · 2010 · 654–656 · 2310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.23 ↗
10. Certain · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 407 · 210.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.07.002 ↗
11. Miller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 418 · 30710.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.07.031 ↗
12. Miller · Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 67210.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.036 ↗
13. Parish · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 445 · 25110.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.11.002 ↗
14. Parish · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 418 · 10610.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.07.035 ↗
15. Fu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 97 · 22550210.1103/PhysRevLett.99.225502 ↗
16. Miller · Front. Mater. Sci. China · 2009 · 3 · 910.1007/s11706-009-0001-8 ↗
17. Xu · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79
18. Larson · 2013
19. Miller · 2014
20. Larson · Scr. Mater. · 2001 · 44 · 35910.1016/S1359-6462(00)00593-5 ↗
21. Miller · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2003 · A353 · 14010.1016/S0921-5093(02)00680-9 ↗
22. Miller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 351 · 26110.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.004 ↗
23. Alinger · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 39210.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.025 ↗
24. Miller · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 27 · 72910.1179/1743284710Y.0000000039 ↗
25. Brandes · J. Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 47 · 391310.1007/s10853-012-6249-x ↗
26. Miller · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 29 · 117410.1179/1743284713Y.0000000207 ↗
27. Yao · Scr. Mater. · 2013 · 69 · 62210.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.07.013 ↗
28. Miller · Curr. Opinions Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2013 · 17 · 20310.1016/j.cossms.2013.08.002 ↗
29. Li · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 445 · 16510.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.048 ↗
30. Edmondson · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 434 · 21010.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.11.049 ↗
31. Edmondson · Scr. Mater. · 2011 · 65 · 73110.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.07.024 ↗
32. Parish · Microsc. Microanal. · 2014 · 20 · 61310.1017/S1431927614000312 ↗
33. Miller · Surf. Interface Anal. · 1979 · 1 · 14910.1002/sia.740010504 ↗
34. Miller · 2000
35. Mamyrin · Soviet Phys. JEPT · 1973 · 37 · 45
36. P. Panayi, U.S. Patent No. 11/913,343, 2007.10.1177/1088767907309669 ↗
37. M.K. Miller, J.M. Hyde, in: 11th Euro. Congr. Electron Microscopy, Dublin, Ireland, CD, August 1996.
38. Inkson · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1998 · 258 · 31310.1016/S0921-5093(98)00950-2 ↗
39. Ates · Mater. Des. · 2007 · 28 · 94810.1016/j.matdes.2005.09.015 ↗
40. Mathon · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386 · 47510.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.163 ↗
41. Legendre · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386 · 53710.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.170 ↗
42. Chen · J. Alloys Compd. · 2010 · 504 · S46010.1016/j.jallcom.2010.02.192 ↗
43. Noh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 417 · 24510.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.059 ↗
44. Wang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 432 · 27410.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.08.001 ↗
45. Hoelzer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · S52910.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.04.027 ↗
46. J.M. Hyde, C.A. English, in: MRS Symp. Proc., Boston, MA, vol. 650, 2000, pp. R6.6.10.1557/PROC-650-R6.6 ↗
47. Thompson · Ultramicroscopy · 2007 · 107 · 13110.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.008 ↗