journal article·2015-12

Investigation of faceted void morphologies in UO 2 by phase field modelling

Yaochan Zhu, Håkan Hallberg

Publisher page

Abstract

In the present study a phase field model for high surface energy anisotropy is developed to model the morphologies of voids in UO2. In order to precisely account for the high anisotropy, an alternative forward-backward strategy based on a staggered grid with an averaged interface normal scheme is used in the numerical procedure. A variety of equilibrium void shapes are reproduced with respect to a constant volume condition. The facet areas and facet energies are calculated. The simulations show excellent agreement with the analytic predictions obtained through Wulff constructions. For the void shapes with high Miller index facets, it is discovered that a slight decrease in total surface area will result in a substantial increase in the total surface energy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Was · 2007
2. Hallberg · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 465 · 66410.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.06.052 ↗
3. Hall · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1987 · 148 · 23710.1016/0022-3115(87)90017-1 ↗
4. Abramowski · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 275 · 1210.1016/S0022-3115(99)00110-5 ↗
5. Abramowski · Surf. Sci. · 2001 · 490 · 41510.1016/S0039-6028(01)01368-1 ↗
6. Carter · 2013
7. Rheinheimer · Acta Mater. · 2015 · 82 · 3210.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.065 ↗
8. Eaglesham · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1993 · 70 · 164310.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1643 ↗
9. Herring · Phys. Rev. · 1951 · 82 · 8710.1103/PhysRev.82.87 ↗
10. Matzke · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1980 · 91 · 20510.1016/0022-3115(80)90048-3 ↗
11. Serizawa · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2013 · 13 · 281510.1021/cg4001335 ↗
12. Van Lierde · J. Mater. Sci. · 1970 · 5 · 52710.1007/BF00556041 ↗
13. Castell · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 68 · 23541110.1103/PhysRevB.68.235411 ↗
14. Carter · Acta Metallurgica Materialia · 1995 · 43 · 430910.1016/0956-7151(95)00134-H ↗
15. Boettinger · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2002 · 32 · 16310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.101901.155803 ↗
16. Chen · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2002 · 32 · 11310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041 ↗
17. Steinbach · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2013 · 43 · 8910.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-121703 ↗
18. van der Waals · J. Stat. Phys. · 1979 · 20 · 20010.1007/BF01011514 ↗
19. Xiao · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 439 · 2510.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.03.076 ↗
20. Millett · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 425 · 13010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.07.034 ↗
21. Hu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90
22. Li · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms · 2013 · 303 · 6210.1016/j.nimb.2012.11.028 ↗
23. Hu · IJMR · 2010 · 101 · 51510.3139/146.110304 ↗
24. Wendler · J. Cryst. Growth · 2011 · 327 · 18910.1016/j.jcrysgro.2011.04.044 ↗
25. Provatas · 2010
26. Karma · Phys. Rev. E · 1998 · 57 · 432310.1103/PhysRevE.57.4323 ↗
27. Fleck · Eur. Phys. J. Plus · 2011 · 12610.1140/epjp/i2011-11095-7 ↗
28. Kim · Phys. Rev. E · 1999 · 60 · 718610.1103/PhysRevE.60.7186 ↗
29. Spatschek · Phys. Rev. E · 2007 · 75 · 06611110.1103/PhysRevE.75.066111 ↗
30. Pfafflin · 2005 · 2
31. Shewmon · ASM · 1963 · 67
32. G. Wulff, Z. Kristallogr 34 (1901) 449–530.10.1524/zkri.1901.34.1.449 ↗