journal article·2015-08Open access

Experimental investigation of neon seeding in the snowflake configuration in TCV

H. Reimerdes, G.P. Canal, B.P. Duval, B. Labit, T. Lunt, F. Nespoli, W.A.J. Vijvers, G. De Temmerman, C. Lowry, T.W. Morgan, B. Tal, M. Wischmeier

Abstract

Recent TCV experiments have examined the effect of the poloidal field strength in the vicinity of the x-point of diverted configurations on their ability to radiate a large fraction of the exhaust power. A larger region of low poloidal field is a key characteristic of the “snowflake” configuration, which has been proposed as an alternative divertor solution that decreases the power flux to the targets in a DEMO-size tokamak. In the investigated Ohmic discharges, increasing the plasma density and seeding neon both increased the radiated exhaust fraction up to 60–70%. In all cases, the highest radiation fraction was determined by the onset of MHD rather than a radiation instability. The experiments indicate that, while the conventional single-null configuration leads to more radiation (+10%) at higher densities, the snowflake configuration radiates more when seeding neon impurities (+15%). Extrapolation of these modest, but systematic, dependencies on the divertor geometry to reactor-relevant higher heating power and larger device size must be based on a physics model.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Fusion materials and technologies · Superconducting Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Neilson · Nucl. Fusion · 2012 · 52 · 04700110.1088/0029-5515/52/4/047001 ↗
2. M. Wischmeier, et al., High density divertor operation for reactor-relevant power exhaust, in: 21st PSI Conference, Kanazawa, Japan, 2014.
3. Ryutov · Phys. Plasmas · 2007 · 14 · 06450210.1063/1.2738399 ↗
4. Umansky · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 07500510.1088/0029-5515/49/7/075005 ↗
5. Kotschenreuther · Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 10250710.1063/1.4824735 ↗
6. Piras · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2013 · 51 · 05500910.1088/0741-3335/51/5/055009 ↗
7. Reimerdes · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2013 · 55 · 12402710.1088/0741-3335/55/12/124027 ↗
8. Kallenbach · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2013 · 55 · 12404110.1088/0741-3335/55/12/124041 ↗
9. Funo · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1999 · 70 · 455210.1063/1.1150111 ↗
10. Sauter · Phys. Plasmas · 2014 · 21 · 05590610.1063/1.4876612 ↗
11. Pitts · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 64810.1016/S0022-3115(98)00599-6 ↗
12. Feng · Contrib. Plasma Phys. · 2004 · 44 · 5710.1002/ctpp.200410009 ↗
13. Lunt · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2014 · 56 · 03500910.1088/0741-3335/56/3/035009 ↗