journal article·2015-01

Phase stability of an aged Pu–0.27 wt.% Ga alloy

D.W. Wheeler, S.M. Ennaceur, M.B. Matthews

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper describes the characterisation of a naturally aged Pu–0.27 wt.% Ga alloy 35 years of age. The alloy was subjected to bulk chemical analysis, density determination, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), optical microscopy, electron probe micro-analysis (EPMA) and hardness measurements. Despite the Ga content being only 0.27 wt.%, it nevertheless appears to be sufficient to retain the alloy in the δ-Pu phase at ambient temperature. This was demonstrated by optical microscopy, density measurements and DSC. However, the ambient temperature stability of the δ-Pu phase is tenuous. This was demonstrated by the propensity of the alloy to undergo transformation to α-Pu when cooled to sub-ambient temperatures. Indeed, both density measurements and DSC indicate that when the alloy is cooled to −50 °C for 1 h the alloy has transformed to more than 40% α-Pu. Moreover, a comparison of the Vickers hardness (expressed as a mean pressure) with transformation pressures for Pu–Ga suggests that the alloy has undergone δ → α′ transformation during the indentation process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Rare-earth and actinide compounds

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Wolfer · Los Alamos Sci. · 2000 · 26 · 274
2. Hecker · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2008 · 39 · 158510.1007/s11661-007-9373-5 ↗
3. Schwartz · Philos. Mag. · 2005 · 85 · 47910.1080/02678370412331320026 ↗
4. Miller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1965 · 17 · 5410.1016/0022-3115(65)90147-9 ↗
5. Chebotarev · 1976 · 37
6. Timofeeva · 1999 · 191
7. Hecker · Los Alamos Sci. · 2000 · 26 · 244
8. Thiebaut · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 361 · 18410.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.024 ↗
9. Chung · J. Alloys Compd. · 2007 · 444–445 · 32910.1016/j.jallcom.2006.10.017 ↗
10. Chebotarev · 1976 · 559
11. Baclet · J. Alloys Compd. · 2007 · 444–445 · 30510.1016/j.jallcom.2006.10.156 ↗
12. Wheeler · J. Alloys Compd. · 2007 · 444–445 · 21210.1016/j.jallcom.2007.01.038 ↗
13. P.D. Bayer, unpublished work.
14. Chung · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 355 · 14210.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.05.015 ↗
15. Robbins · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 324 · 12510.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.09.011 ↗
16. Mitchell · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 385 · 9510.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.10.022 ↗
17. Ennaceur · Thermochim. Acta · 2012 · 539 · 8410.1016/j.tca.2012.04.010 ↗
18. Jeffries · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 384 · 22210.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.11.021 ↗
19. Chung · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 385 · 9110.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.09.031 ↗
20. Bayer · Discovery · 2009 · 19 · 12
21. Pereyra · Mater. Charact. · 2008 · 59 · 167510.1016/j.matchar.2008.03.002 ↗
22. Johnson · 1985
23. Hecker · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2004 · 49 · 42910.1016/S0079-6425(03)00032-X ↗
24. Tabor · 1986 · 129
25. Bowden · 1964 · vol. II · 320
26. Goldberg · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1976 · 60 · 13710.1016/0022-3115(76)90159-8 ↗