journal article·2006-02

Modelling of thermally enhanced erosion of beryllium

K. Schmid, M. Baldwin, R. Doerner

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 348· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents two concurring models for the thermally enhanced erosion of metals. The modelling particularly deals with the erosion of beryllium by a helium plasma as an example system. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are used to reduce the number of free parameters in the models. A model of sublimation of ad-atoms created during ion impact was earlier proposed as an explanation of thermally enhanced erosion. Using MD calculations the parameter space for this model was reduced to a single free parameter, the areal surface defect density δ Def . Using the reduced parameter space a very low δ Def has to be assumed in order to reproduce the experimental observations. Therefore a new model is proposed here that is very similar to the ad-atom model but is based on a different mechanism to create weakly bonded surface atoms. The paper shows that inclusion of He atoms during exposure to high flux (10 22 m −2 s −1 ) of low energy He (50 eV) leads to the formation of weakly bonded atoms in the surface. The comparison of both models with experimental data and their applicability to other projectile/target systems is discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. W. Eckstein, C. Garcia-Rosales, J. Roth, W. Ottenberger, Sputtering Data, vol. 9/82, Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, D-85748 Garching, 1993.
2. Eckstein · 1991
3. Bohr · Mat. Fys. Medd. · 1984 · 23 · 309
4. Sigmund · Phys. Rev. · 1969 · 184 · 38310.1103/PhysRev.184.383 ↗
5. Roth · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1982 · 111&112 · 77510.1016/0022-3115(82)90304-X ↗
6. Philipps · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1982 · 111&112 · 78110.1016/0022-3115(82)90305-1 ↗
7. Roth · Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B · 1985 · 7&8 · 78810.1016/0168-583X(85)90470-7 ↗
8. Doerner · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 447110.1063/1.1687038 ↗
9. Möller · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 1988 · 51 · 35510.1016/0010-4655(88)90148-8 ↗
10. Alcock · Can. Metall. Quat. · 1984 · 23 · 30910.1179/cmq.1984.23.3.309 ↗
11. Jung · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 202 · 21010.1016/0022-3115(93)90389-G ↗
12. Allen · 1987
13. Nose · Mol. Phys. · 1984 · 52 · 25510.1080/00268978400101201 ↗
14. Hoover · Phys. Rev. A · 1985 · 31 · 169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
15. Beeman · J. Comput. Phys. · 1976 · 20 · 13010.1016/0021-9991(76)90059-0 ↗
16. Ueda · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 258 · 71
17. Ueda · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 283 · 110010.1016/S0022-3115(00)00288-9 ↗
18. Finnis · Philos. Mag. A · 1984 · 50 · 4510.1080/01418618408244210 ↗
19. Igarashi · Philos. Mag. B · 1991 · 63 · 60310.1080/13642819108225975 ↗
20. Cayphas · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 246 · 17110.1016/S0022-3115(97)00102-5 ↗