journal article·2003-10

Some critical experiments on the strain-rate sensitivity of nanocrystalline nickel

R Schwaiger, B Moser, M Dao, N Chollacoop, S Suresh

Acta Materialia· Volume 51· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Systematic experiments have been performed to investigate the rate sensitivity of deformation in fully dense nanocrystalline Ni using two different experimental techniques: depth-sensing indentation and tensile testing. Results from both types of tests reveal that the strain-rate sensitivity is a strong function of grain size. Specifically microcrystalline and ultra-fine crystalline pure Ni, with grain size range of 1 µm and 100–1000 nm, respectively, exhibit essentially rateindependent plastic flow over the range 3 × 10 4 to 3 × 10 1 s 1 , whereas nanocrystalline pure Ni with a grain size of approximately 40 nm, exhibits marked rate sensitivity over the same range. A simple computational model, predicated on the premise that a rate-sensitive grain-boundary affected zone exists, is shown to explain the observed effect of grain size on the rate-dependent plastic response.  2003 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Suryanarayana · Int Mater Rev · 1995 · 40 · 4110.1179/imr.1995.40.2.41 ↗
2. Gleiter · Prog Mater Sci · 1989 · 33 · 22310.1016/0079-6425(89)90001-7 ↗
3. Masumura · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 452710.1016/S1359-6454(98)00150-5 ↗
4. Farhat · Mater Sci Eng A · 1996 · 206 · 30210.1016/0921-5093(95)10016-4 ↗
5. Jeong · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 49310.1016/S1359-6462(00)00625-4 ↗
6. McFadden · Nature · 1999 · 398 · 68410.1038/19486 ↗
7. Lu · Science · 2000 · 287 · 146310.1126/science.287.5457.1463 ↗
8. Lu · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 45 · 116310.1016/S1359-6462(01)01138-1 ↗
9. Torre · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 395710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00198-2 ↗
10. Wang · Mater Sci Eng A · 1997 · 237 · 15010.1016/S0921-5093(97)00124-X ↗
11. Mayo · J Mater Res · 1990 · 5 · 107310.1557/JMR.1990.1073 ↗
12. Mayo · J Mater Res · 1992 · 7 · 97310.1557/JMR.1992.0973 ↗
13. Yamakov · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 6110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00329-9 ↗
14. Schiotz · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 60 · 1197110.1103/PhysRevB.60.11971 ↗
15. Fu · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 256710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00062-3 ↗
16. Carsley · Nanostruct Mater · 1995 · 5 · 44110.1016/0965-9773(95)00257-F ↗
17. Oliver · J Mater Res · 1992 · 7 · 156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
18. Lucas · Metall Mater Trans A · 1999 · 30 · 60110.1007/s11661-999-0051-7 ↗
19. Pethica · 1989 · 13
20. Feng G, Ngan AHW. J Materials Research 2002;17:660.10.1557/JMR.2002.0094 ↗
21. Kumar · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 38710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00421-4 ↗
22. Ranganathan · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 116910.1016/S1359-6462(01)00678-9 ↗
23. Ke · Nanostruct Mater · 1995 · 5 · 68910.1016/0965-9773(95)00281-I ↗
24. Hackney · 1996 · 421
25. Youngdahl · 2001 · B1
26. Youngdahl · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 147510.1016/S1359-6462(01)00712-6 ↗
27. Keblinski · Scripta Mater · 1999 · 41 · 63110.1016/S1359-6462(99)00142-6 ↗
28. Van Swygenhoven · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 60 · 2210.1103/PhysRevB.60.22 ↗
29. Kim · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 49310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00353-5 ↗
30. Cullity · 1956
31. Van Swygenhoven · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 309-310 · 44010.1016/S0921-5093(00)01794-9 ↗