Some critical experiments on the strain-rate sensitivity of nanocrystalline nickel
Source abstract
Abstract
Systematic experiments have been performed to investigate the rate sensitivity of deformation in fully dense nanocrystalline Ni using two different experimental techniques: depth-sensing indentation and tensile testing. Results from both types of tests reveal that the strain-rate sensitivity is a strong function of grain size. Specifically microcrystalline and ultra-fine crystalline pure Ni, with grain size range of 1 µm and 100–1000 nm, respectively, exhibit essentially rateindependent plastic flow over the range 3 × 10 4 to 3 × 10 1 s 1 , whereas nanocrystalline pure Ni with a grain size of approximately 40 nm, exhibits marked rate sensitivity over the same range. A simple computational model, predicated on the premise that a rate-sensitive grain-boundary affected zone exists, is shown to explain the observed effect of grain size on the rate-dependent plastic response. 2003 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Suryanarayana · Int Mater Rev · 1995 · 40 · 4110.1179/imr.1995.40.2.41 ↗
2. Gleiter · Prog Mater Sci · 1989 · 33 · 22310.1016/0079-6425(89)90001-7 ↗
3. Masumura · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 452710.1016/S1359-6454(98)00150-5 ↗
4. Farhat · Mater Sci Eng A · 1996 · 206 · 30210.1016/0921-5093(95)10016-4 ↗
5. Jeong · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 49310.1016/S1359-6462(00)00625-4 ↗
6. McFadden · Nature · 1999 · 398 · 68410.1038/19486 ↗
7. Lu · Science · 2000 · 287 · 146310.1126/science.287.5457.1463 ↗
8. Lu · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 45 · 116310.1016/S1359-6462(01)01138-1 ↗
9. Torre · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 395710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00198-2 ↗
10. Wang · Mater Sci Eng A · 1997 · 237 · 15010.1016/S0921-5093(97)00124-X ↗
11. Mayo · J Mater Res · 1990 · 5 · 107310.1557/JMR.1990.1073 ↗
12. Mayo · J Mater Res · 1992 · 7 · 97310.1557/JMR.1992.0973 ↗
13. Yamakov · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 6110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00329-9 ↗
14. Schiotz · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 60 · 1197110.1103/PhysRevB.60.11971 ↗
15. Fu · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 256710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00062-3 ↗
16. Carsley · Nanostruct Mater · 1995 · 5 · 44110.1016/0965-9773(95)00257-F ↗
17. Oliver · J Mater Res · 1992 · 7 · 156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
18. Lucas · Metall Mater Trans A · 1999 · 30 · 60110.1007/s11661-999-0051-7 ↗
19. Pethica · 1989 · 13
20. Feng G, Ngan AHW. J Materials Research 2002;17:660.10.1557/JMR.2002.0094 ↗
21. Kumar · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 38710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00421-4 ↗
22. Ranganathan · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 116910.1016/S1359-6462(01)00678-9 ↗
23. Ke · Nanostruct Mater · 1995 · 5 · 68910.1016/0965-9773(95)00281-I ↗
24. Hackney · 1996 · 421
25. Youngdahl · 2001 · B1
26. Youngdahl · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 147510.1016/S1359-6462(01)00712-6 ↗
27. Keblinski · Scripta Mater · 1999 · 41 · 63110.1016/S1359-6462(99)00142-6 ↗
28. Van Swygenhoven · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 60 · 2210.1103/PhysRevB.60.22 ↗
29. Kim · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 49310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00353-5 ↗
30. Cullity · 1956
31. Van Swygenhoven · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 309-310 · 44010.1016/S0921-5093(00)01794-9 ↗