The role of twinning and untwinning in yielding behavior in hot-extruded Mg–Al–Zn alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper examines the effect of compressive pre-deformation on subsequent tensile deformation behavior in a hot-extruded AZ31 Mg alloy bar with a ring fiber texture, and with the basal planes parallel to the extrusion direction. Such an orientation favors extensive { 1 0 1 ¯ 2 } twinning under compressive loading, resulting in a comparably low compressive yield stress. In contrast, the basal slip and { 1 0 1 ¯ 2 } twinning are difficult to operate under tensile testing, resulting in a high tensile yield strength. Compressive pre-deformation causes a significant drop in tensile yield strength, from ∼265 to ∼160 MPa, irrespective of the amount of pre-deformation strain. The latter value of ∼160 MPa nearly coincides with the compressive yield strength. The lattice reorientation of 86.3° caused by twinning during compressive loading favors untwinning in the twinned areas during subsequent tensile reloading, leading to a significant drop in tensile yield strength.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Stohr · Philos Mag · 1972 · 25 · 131310.1080/14786437208223856 ↗
2. Obara · Acta Mater · 1973 · 21 · 84510.1016/0001-6160(73)90141-7 ↗
3. del Valle · Mater Sci Eng A · 2003 · 355 · 6810.1016/S0921-5093(03)00043-1 ↗
4. Mabuchi · Scripta Mater · 1996 · 36 · 68110.1016/S1359-6462(96)00444-7 ↗
5. Kim · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 329310.1016/S1359-6454(03)00161-7 ↗
6. Lin · Mater Sci Eng · 2005 · 402 · 25010.1016/j.msea.2005.04.018 ↗
7. Agnew · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 313510.1016/j.actamat.2005.02.019 ↗
8. Wang · Mater Trans · 2003 · 44 · 227610.2320/matertrans.44.2276 ↗
9. Wang · Mater Chem Phys · 2003 · 81 · 1110.1016/S0254-0584(03)00168-8 ↗
10. Armstrong · 2005 · 172
11. Yamashita · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 300 · 14210.1016/S0921-5093(00)01660-9 ↗
12. Mukai · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 45 · 8910.1016/S1359-6462(01)00996-4 ↗
13. Staroselsky · Int J Plasticity · 2003 · 19 · 184310.1016/S0749-6419(03)00039-1 ↗
14. Agnew · Int J Plasticity · 2005 · 21 · 116110.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.018 ↗
15. Jiang · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 77110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.029 ↗
16. Nave · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 51 · 88110.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.07.002 ↗
17. Yi · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 54910.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.024 ↗
18. Hosford · 1993
19. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
20. Armstrong · J Inst Met · 1962 · 91 · 311
21. Anken · 1999
22. Tenckhoff · 1988
23. Gharghouri · Philos Mag · 1999 · 79 · 167110.1080/01418619908210386 ↗
24. Wang · Mater Sci Forum · 2003 · 426–432 · 265510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.426-432.2655 ↗
25. Armstrong · Acta Metall · 1968 · 16 · 34710.1016/0001-6160(68)90021-7 ↗