journal article·2014-11Open access

Thermal measurements and computational simulations of three-phase (CeO2–MgAl2O4–CeMgAl11O19) and four-phase (3Y-TZP–Al2O3–MgAl2O4–LaPO4) composites as surrogate inert matrix nuclear fuel

Jesse P. Angle, Andrew T. Nelson, Danju Men, Martha L. Mecartney

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 454· Issue 1-3

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the temperature dependent thermal conductivity of multiphase ceramic composites for simulated inert matrix nuclear fuel. Fine grained composites were made of CeO2–MgAl2O4–CeMgAl11O19 or 3Y-TZP–Al2O3–MgAl2O4–LaPO4. CeO2 and 3Y-TZP are used as UO2 surrogates due to their similar structures and low thermal conductivities. Laser flash analysis from room temperature to 1273 K (1000 °C) was used to determine the temperature dependent thermal conductivity. A computational approach using Object Oriented Finite Element Analysis Version 2 (OOF2) was employed to simulate the composite thermal conductivity based on the microstructure. Observed discrepancies between experimental and simulated thermal conductivities at low temperature may be due to Kapitza resistance; however, there is less than 3% deviation between models and experiments above 673 K (400 °C) for both compositions. When the surrogate phase was replaced with UO2 in the computational model for the four-phase composite, a 12–16% increase in thermal conductivity resulted compared to single phase UO2, in the range of 673–1273 K (400–1000 °C). This computational approach may be potentially viable for the high-throughput evaluation of composite systems and the strategic selection of inert phases without extensive sample fabrication during the initial development stages of composite nuclear fuel design.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Nuclear materials and radiation effects

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. D.R. Olander, Fundamental aspects of nuclear reactor fuel elements Technical Information Center, Office of Public Affairs available from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Oak Ridge, Tenn. Springfield, Va., 1976; p ix, 613 p.
2. Konings · 2012
3. Fink · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 279 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(99)00273-1 ↗
4. Kittel · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 204 · 110.1016/0022-3115(93)90193-3 ↗
5. Une · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 278 · 5410.1016/S0022-3115(99)00214-7 ↗
6. Valdez · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 393 · 12610.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.05.019 ↗
7. Nelson · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 444 · 38510.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.033 ↗
8. Nitani · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 247 · 5910.1016/S0022-3115(97)00063-9 ↗
9. Kuramoto · Prog. Nucl. Energy · 2001 · 38 · 42310.1016/S0149-1970(00)00150-5 ↗
10. Yamashita · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 320 · 12610.1016/S0022-3115(03)00178-8 ↗
11. Men · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 443 · 12010.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.06.042 ↗
12. Dacheux · Am. Mineral · 2013 · 98 · 83310.2138/am.2013.4307 ↗
13. Clavier · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2011 · 31 · 94110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.12.019 ↗
14. P.E.D. Morgan, R.M. Housley, J.B. Davis, M.L. DeHaan, Chemical and Ceramic Methods Toward Safe Storage of Actinides, DOE/ER/45617 United States10.2172/850364Mon Apr 05 07:21:35 EDT 2010IDOEnglish, 2005, p Medium, ED.10.2172/850364 ↗
15. Men · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2013 · 96 · 332510.1111/jace.12503 ↗
16. Munro · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1997 · 80 · 191910.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03074.x ↗
17. Wilkerson · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2013 · 96 · 85910.1111/jace.12125 ↗
18. Schlichting · J. Mater. Sci. · 2001 · 36 · 300310.1023/A:1017970924312 ↗
19. Jiang · Mater. Res. Bull. · 2010 · 45 · 150610.1016/j.materresbull.2010.06.014 ↗
20. Winter · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2007 · 90 · 53310.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01410.x ↗
21. Sears · Neutron News · 1992 · 3 · 2610.1080/10448639208218770 ↗
22. Nelson · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2014 · 34
23. Morgan · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1982 · 65 · C11410.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10481.x ↗
24. Schatzmann · J. Mater. Chem. · 2009 · 19 · 572010.1039/b906456g ↗
25. Standard Test Method for Density of Compacted or Sintered Powder Metallurgy (PM) Products Using Archimedes’ Principle, In B962–08 ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2008.
26. Reid · Comp. Mater. Sci. · 2008 · 43 · 98910.1016/j.commatsci.2008.02.016 ↗
27. Reid · Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol. · 2009 · 35 · 36110.1504/IJMPT.2009.025687 ↗
28. Kadoya · J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data · 1985 · 14 · 94710.1063/1.555744 ↗
29. Kapitza · J. Phys-Ussr · 1941 · 4 · 181
30. Pollack · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1969 · 4110.1103/RevModPhys.41.48 ↗
31. Nan · J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 81 · 669210.1063/1.365209 ↗
32. Smith · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2003 · 86 · 10510.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03285.x ↗
33. Yang · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2010 · 30 · 311110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.07.007 ↗