journal article·2014-06

Effects of processing condition on the microstructural and tensile properties of 14Cr-based oxide dispersion strengthened alloys

Jeoung Han Kim, Thak Sang Byun, Jae Hoon Lee, Jeon Yeong Min, Seong Woong Kim, Chan Hee Park, Bong Ho Lee

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 449· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Eight different oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) steels were manufactured to investigate the influence of several processing parameters including milling temperature, rotation speed, and consolidation temperature. Microstructural evolution and resulting mechanical properties were then characterized for the different manufacturing processes. As milling temperature decreases, microstructures become finer and room temperature tensile strength increases. Lowering the consolidation temperature induces an increase in tensile strength with a decrease of ductility. The microstructure becomes homogeneous as the tensile strength increases when the milling speed increases from 100 rpm to 250 rpm. However, the improvement seems to be less effective than the adoption of a cryomilling technique. Porosity development was considerably dependent not only on consolidation condition but also on powder quality after mechanical alloying.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Miller · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2003 · 353 · 14010.1016/S0921-5093(02)00680-9 ↗
2. Alinger · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 39210.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.025 ↗
3. Ukai · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 1999 · 36 · 71010.1080/18811248.1999.9726259 ↗
4. Lindau · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 76910.1016/S0022-3115(02)01045-0 ↗
5. Odette · Annu Rev. Mater. Res. · 2008 · 38 · 47110.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130315 ↗
6. Schaeublin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 77810.1016/S0022-3115(02)01193-5 ↗
7. Rahmanifard · Metall. Mater. Trans. · 2013 · 44A · 99010.1007/s11661-012-1429-5 ↗
8. Iwata · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 417 · 16210.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.058 ↗
9. Cayron · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 335 · 8310.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.06.010 ↗
10. Nishi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 417 · 92010.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.159 ↗
11. Kim · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2013 · 559 · 11110.1016/j.msea.2012.08.041 ↗
12. Kim · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 407 · 14310.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.09.054 ↗
13. Kim · J. Alloy Compd. · 2013 · 580 · 12510.1016/j.jallcom.2013.04.165 ↗
14. Hirata · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 1
15. Fu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 22550210.1103/PhysRevLett.99.225502 ↗
16. Kim · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · 45810.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.02.048 ↗
17. Kim · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2013 · 559 · 10110.1016/j.msea.2012.08.042 ↗