UO2 dissolution in Boom Clay conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
The solubility of uranium dioxide (UO 2) was measured in real and synthetic Boom Clay waters with varying concentrations of humic acids and carbonate under reducing conditions at 20 °C. Uranium concentrations in function of time suggest the reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) by the humic acids which is occurring faster in real clay water than in synthetic clay waters. Humic acids induce also a competition to complex U(VI) in carbonate-containing solution, but they are not able to control the uranium concentration at high bicarbonate concentration (0.02 mol dm −3). Nevertheless they may play a role at low carbonate concentration. In our experimental conditions, the geochemical calculations indicate that two uranium secondary phases (U 4O 9 and UO 2(c)) are susceptible to control the uranium concentration in solution. These calculations are in good agreement with results of the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. At the end of tests, uranium concentrations reach steady-state values between 3 × 10 −8 and 5 × 10 −8 mol dm −3 in the bicarbonate-rich solutions. Although these concentrations are considered as conservative, they are 10–100 times higher than in natural Boom Clay. The consequence is that spent fuel could slowly dissolve in the interstitial clay water undersaturated with respect to UO 2/UO 2+x of the fuel.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radioactive element chemistry and processing · Radioactivity and Radon Measurements · Radioactive contamination and transfer
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. PAGIS 1988: Performance Assessment of Geological Isolation Systems for Radioactive Waste, report EUR 11775 EN, 1988
2. A. Dierckx, Boom Clay in situ porewater chemistry, SCK·CEN, BLG-734, 1997 (available from SCK·CEN, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol, Belgium)
3. Shoesmith · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 282 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(00)00392-5 ↗
4. Pourbaix · 1974
5. N. Maes, L. Wang, G. Delécaut, T. Beauwens, M. Van Geet, M. Put, J. Van der Lee, P. Warwick, A. Hall, G. Walker, A. Maes, C. Bruggeman, D. Bennett, J. Higgo, A. Galson, Migration case study: Transport of radionuclides in a reducing clay sediment (TRANCOM-II). First progress report from September 2000 to August 2001, R-3576, 2002, (available from SCK·CEN, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol, Belgium)
6. W. Verdickt, De Interactie van Europium en Uranium met Boomse Klei onder in situ omstandigheden, Thesis at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 1997
7. A. Dierckx, M. Put, P. De Cannière, L. Wang, N. Maes, M. Aertsens, A. Maes, J. Vancluysen, W. Verdickt, R. Gielen, M. Christians, P. Warwick, A. Hall, J. Van der Lee, TRANCOM-CLAY: Transport of radionuclides due to complexation with organic matter in clay conditions, Final report, EUR 19135 EN, 2000
8. Grenthe · 1992
9. Neck · Radiochim. Acta · 2001 · 89 · 110.1524/ract.2001.89.1.001 ↗
10. Bruno · Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. · 1987 · 84 · 15310.1557/PROC-84-153 ↗
11. Yajima · Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 1995 · 353 · 113710.1557/PROC-353-1137 ↗
12. Rai · Radiochim. Acta · 1998 · 82 · 1710.1524/ract.1998.82.special-issue.17 ↗
13. Guilbert · Radiochim. Acta · 2002 · 90 · 7510.1524/ract.2002.90.2_2002.75 ↗
14. K. Ollila, Dissolution of unirradiated UO2 fuel in synthetic groundwater – Final report (1996–1998). Posiva 99–24, May 1999, Posiva Oy, Finland10.1557/PROC-465-549 ↗
15. K. Le Lous, Etude de la lixiviation du combustible usé en présence de matériaux d’environnement. Thèse de doctorat de l’Université Paris Sud (France), 1997
16. D.L. Parkhurst, User’s Guide to PHREEQC – A Computer Program for Speciation, Reaction-Path, Advective-Transport, and Inverse Geochemical Modelling, US Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4227, 1995
17. J.W. Ball, D.K. Nordstrom, WATEQ4F – User’s manual with revised thermodynamic data base and test cases for calculating speciation of major, trace and redox elements in natural waters: US Geological Survey Open-File Report 90–129, 199110.3133/ofr90129 ↗
18. Bruno · Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 1989 · 127 · 88710.1557/PROC-127-887 ↗
19. Drever · 1997
20. B. Grambow, A. Martinez-Esparza., P.P. Diaz-Arocas, J. de Pablo, J.L. Paul., G. Marx, J.P. Glatz, K. Lemmens, K. Ollila, H. Christensen. Source term for performance assessment of spent fuel as a waste form, Final report for contract FI4W-CT95-0004 with the EC, EUR 19140, 2000
21. S. Van den Berghe, The uranium valence in the Cs–U–O system: crystal structures and thin layers. Doctoral thesis of the University of Limoges (France), 200110.1016/S0022-3115(01)00461-5 ↗
22. Allen · J. Phys. Chem. · 1982 · 86 · 22410.1021/j100391a018 ↗
23. C. Cachoir, Etude du comportement d’un dioxyde d’uranium en présence d’une eau granitique: rôle des conditions redox, du rapport S/V et de la concentration en carbonates. Thèse de doctorat de l’Université Paris Sud (France), 1997
24. Allen · J. Chem. Soc. Dalton, Trans. · 1974 · 12 · 129610.1039/dt9740001296 ↗
25. Veal · Phys. Rev. A · 1974 · 49 · 466
26. Moulder · 1992
27. Guilbert · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 282 · 7510.1016/S0022-3115(00)00239-7 ↗
28. M. De Craen, The formation of septarian carbonate concretions in organic-rich argillaceous sediments. Doctoral thesis of the Katholieke Universiteit LEUVEN (Belgium), 1998
29. W. Stumm, J.J. Morgan, Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Waters, 3rd Ed., Environmental Science and Technology, 1995