journal article·2007-03

Burnup simulations and spent fuel characteristics of ZrO2 based inert matrix fuels

E.A. Schneider, M.R. Deinert, S.T. Herring, K.B. Cady

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 361· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Reducing the inventory of long lived isotopes that are contained in spent nuclear fuel is essential for maximizing repository capacity and extending the lifetime of related storage. Because of their non-fertile matrices, inert matrix fuels (IMF’s) could be an ideal vehicle for using light-water reactors to help decrease the inventory of plutonium and other transuranics (neptunium, americium, curium) that are contained within spent uranium oxide fuel (UOX). Quantifying the characteristics of spent IMF is therefore of fundamental importance to determining its effect on repository design and capacity. We consider six ZrO2 based IMF formulations with different transuranic loadings in a 1–8 IMF to UOX pin-cell arrangement. Burnup calculations are performed using a collision probability model where transport of neutrons through space is modeled using fuel to moderator transport and escape probabilities. The lethargy dependent neutron flux is treated with a high resolution multigroup thermalization method. The results of the reactor physics model are compared to a benchmark case performed with Montebruns and indicate that the approach yields reliable results applicable to high-level analyses of spent fuel isotopics. The data generated show that a fourfold reduction in the radiological and integrated thermal output is achievable in single recycle using IMF, as compared to direct disposal of an energy equivalent spent UOX.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Nuclear materials and radiation effects

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Xu · Nucl. Sci. Eng. · 2005 · 151 · 26110.13182/NSE05-A2545 ↗
2. Lamarsh · 1972
3. S. Piet, B. Dixon, R. Hill, E.A. Schneider, D. Shropshire, J.D. Smith, R. Wigeland, Objectives, strategies and challenges for the advanced fuel cycle initiative, in: Proceedings of the American Institute of Chemical Engineering, Atlanta GA, 2005.
4. Lombardi · Ann. Nucl. Energy · 1996 · 23 · 111710.1016/0306-4549(95)00095-X ↗
5. Kasemeyer · Nucl. Technol. · 1998 · 122 · 5210.13182/NT98-A2850 ↗
6. Herring · Nucl. Technol. · 2004 · 147 · 8410.13182/NT04-A3516 ↗
7. Ledergerber · Prog. Nucl. Energy · 2001 · 38 · 30110.1016/S0149-1970(00)00122-0 ↗
8. Degueldre · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 320 · 9610.1016/S0022-3115(03)00175-2 ↗
9. Hellwig · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 340 · 16310.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.11.004 ↗
10. Hellwig · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 319 · 8710.1016/S0022-3115(03)00138-7 ↗
11. Kasemeyer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 319 · 14210.1016/S0022-3115(03)00146-6 ↗
12. Richter · 2002
13. Medvedev · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 342 · 4810.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.03.017 ↗
14. Schneider · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 357 · 1910.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.04.012 ↗
15. A.T. Answers Software Service, WIMSD A Neutronics Code for Standard Lattice Physics Analysis, OECD/NEA, Winfrith, United Kingdom, NEA-1507/02, June 1997.
16. M. Takano, Burnup credit criticality benchmark – result of phase 1A, NEA, NEA/NSC/DOC (93) 22, 1994.
17. O’connor · 2003
18. A.G. Croff, A users manual for the ORIGIN2 computer code, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN, ORNL/TM-7175, July 1980.
19. Driscoll · 1990
20. DOE, The path to sustainable nuclear energy, basic and applied research opportunities for advanced fuel cycles, Department of Energy, Washington DC, September 2005.